On 14 April 2014 05:19, Jim Campbell wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Ekaterina Gerasimova
> wrote:
>>
>> On 12 April 2014 05:29, Sindhu S wrote:
>> > On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 5:02 AM, Ekaterina Gerasimova
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The board expects that you may have some ques
On 14 April 2014 10:02, Dave Neary wrote:
> Hi Kat,
>
> Has any thought been Hi en to charging an administrative handling fee for
> Women's Outreach? Clearly it is taking a lot of time to administer, it does
> not seem fair that the GNOME Foundation shoulder all of the financial burden
> of managi
Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 12:32:12AM +0100, Ekaterina Gerasimova wrote:
>> The board expects that you may have some questions or would like to
>> know more details about the problem, please read
>> https://wiki.gnome.org/FoundationBoard/CurrentBudgetFAQ and contact
>> the board
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 12:32:12AM +0100, Ekaterina Gerasimova wrote:
> The board expects that you may have some questions or would like to
> know more details about the problem, please read
> https://wiki.gnome.org/FoundationBoard/CurrentBudgetFAQ and contact
> the board at board-l...@gnome.org if
Hi Kat,
Has any thought been Hi en to charging an administrative handling fee for
Women's Outreach? Clearly it is taking a lot of time to administer, it does
not seem fair that the GNOME Foundation shoulder all of the financial
burden of managing it.
Cheers,
Dave.
On Apr 12, 2014 1:32 AM, "Ekate
Matthew Garrett wrote:
...
> GNOME exists because people contribute to it. OPW has demonstrated a
> strong track record of creating long-term contributors. The mere
> existence of OPW has caused people who might otherwise not be
> enthusiastic about contributing to GNOME to contribute to GNOME, ev
