On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Germán Poo-Caamaño wrote:
> Luis
> worried that making the TODO list the Bountie list was
> dangerous, because people might end up doing only the things
> people pay for. Have we already started down this slop already
> with
[Resending in full, as in my previous I accidentally pressed the Send button by
mistake]
On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 15:43 -0500, meg ford wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Tristan Van Berkom <
> tris...@upstairslabs.com> wrote:
> >
> > I think perhaps, if we organized bounties which clearly and
On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 15:43 -0500, meg ford wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Tristan Van Berkom <
> tris...@upstairslabs.com> wrote:
> >
> > I think perhaps, if we organized bounties which clearly and definitely
> > improve software that industry is going to use, and not only for the
> > s
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Jeff Fortin wrote:
> (Forking this particular topic out of the OPW discussion)
>
>
> Le dimanche 14 septembre 2014 à 18:45 -0500, Michael Catanzaro a écrit :
>
>> > [...] it's been a year since we collected the privacy campaign
>> > money; I guess we still have no
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Tristan Van Berkom <
tris...@upstairslabs.com> wrote:
>
> I think perhaps, if we organized bounties which clearly and definitely
> improve software that industry is going to use, and not only for the
> singular purpose of the GNOME Desktop Environment, then per
Changing topic as this thread has branched in many directions (as others
later in this thread pointed out).
On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 15:16 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 13:58 +0200, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 09:51:15AM +0100, Ekaterina Gerasimova wrote
(Forking this particular topic out of the OPW discussion)
Le dimanche 14 septembre 2014 à 18:45 -0500, Michael Catanzaro a écrit :
> > [...] it's been a year since we collected the privacy campaign
> > money; I guess we still have no clue what we're doing with it? :)
Le mardi 16 septembre 2014
On 09/17/2014 01:58 PM, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 09:51:15AM +0100, Ekaterina Gerasimova wrote:
The approach to budgeting is similar in that the Foundation and Google
both have a budget, but our budgets are quite different. Any spending
in any area means that that money can
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> hi;
>
> On 16 September 2014 14:22, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
>
>> Philip said for example:
>
> Philip has scarcely any idea about any of this stuff, as he already
> demonstrated plenty of times, couple with an overinflated sense of his
> im
On Sep 17, 2014 9:17 AM, "Bastien Nocera" wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 13:58 +0200, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 09:51:15AM +0100, Ekaterina Gerasimova wrote:
> > > The approach to budgeting is similar in that the Foundation and Google
> > > both have a budget, but our b
On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 13:58 +0200, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 09:51:15AM +0100, Ekaterina Gerasimova wrote:
> > The approach to budgeting is similar in that the Foundation and Google
> > both have a budget, but our budgets are quite different. Any spending
> > in any area mea
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 09:51:15AM +0100, Ekaterina Gerasimova wrote:
> The approach to budgeting is similar in that the Foundation and Google
> both have a budget, but our budgets are quite different. Any spending
> in any area means that that money cannot be spent in another area.
What if the Fo
On 16/09/2014, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
> Thank you very much for your answer, Kat.
>
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 06:12:15PM +0100, Ekaterina Gerasimova wrote:
>> interns attending events in 2014 were sponsored within allocated
>> travel budgets out of general funds or by sponsors for that event.
>
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
