Re: Proposal for an Events Code of Conduct and Policy Referendum

Hi, On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 4:54 PM, Alexandre Franke wrote: > > Did you mean to quote a specific part of Allan’s email? Because my > email was about what happened during the time when discussions were > still within the WG (and the conflict that emerged from it) and yours > is

Re: Proposal for an Events Code of Conduct and Policy Referendum

On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:54 PM, meg ford wrote: > I do not completely agree with Allan's explanation here. While I have been > involved in the current discussions about the CoC proposal, it has been as a > member of the Board, not as a member of the WG. I was not involved in

Re: Proposal for an Events Code of Conduct and Policy Referendum

Hi, On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Alexandre Franke wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 6:30 PM, Allan Day wrote: > > because Ben's behaviour had become so unacceptable (despite multiple > > warnings regarding basic behaviour) that it was difficult to

Re: Proposal for an Events Code of Conduct and Policy Referendum

Hi, On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 6:30 PM, Allan Day wrote: > because Ben's behaviour had become so unacceptable (despite multiple > warnings regarding basic behaviour) that it was difficult to get > anything done within the wider working group context. And on Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at

Re: Proposal for an Events Code of Conduct and Policy Referendum

Hello all, The board discussed in the last meeting the validity of the document and has approved that the current proposal, including its last changes, is legitimate, so its evaluation will be continued. Best, Carlos Soriano On 24 April 2018 at 10:45, Allan Day wrote: >