On 05/10/09 23:49, Bruno Pinho wrote:
Hi, when I did the translate this tutorial of GTK+, for who have I to
send this translate?
Hi Bruno,
If you create a bug against GTK+, component being Website and add the
relevant files there, I will add them.
Thanks for doing this too! :)
--
Regards,
On 22/02/10 19:27, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
* It seems we have lost the mobile battle. Can we do something about it
or simply retreat?. I like the idea of creating more components and some
of this components can be added to the GNOME mobile platform.
Have we lost the mobile battle? It
On 22/02/10 20:26, Andy Tai wrote:
seems gtk+'s object model overhead (for example, object method
invocation) is too high, especially visible on mobile platforms... it
should be possible to optimize to reduce this overhead...
I agree with Emmanuele.
Please provide evidence when making wild
On 23/02/10 12:36, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
2010/2/23 Dave Nearydne...@gnome.org:
I'd like to point out something though.
As promising as the situation was, I don't think they seriously
invested in the toolkit itself AFACT, during all this years RedHat
(through mclasen and alexl) and individual
On 24/02/10 10:11, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 09:03 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
At some point you have to clean up your code base, that's been the
case
in every project I have worked on. I don't think it is a bad thing
that
GTK+ is released just more cleaned up, but others
On 15/04/11 14:45, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 11:39 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
We wanted to discuss with someone involved in that space what our
options were.It's an informal chat about what could be done. Andreas
took on the action item, and chose to talk with Ryan because he
On 18/04/11 11:49, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
* Johannes Schmid informed the board that at the Toronto hackfest
that they discussed about an organization that decided to use Qt
instead of GTK+ mainly because they were able to get a support
contract for Qt. Therefore we thought it might be a good
On 18/04/11 16:34, Stormy Peters wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 4:58 AM, Martyn Russell mar...@lanedo.com
mailto:mar...@lanedo.com wrote:
On 18/04/11 11:49, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
One of his ideas was to add a list of companies that gave GTK+
support
On 23/05/11 12:02, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 09:29 +0200, Lionel Dricot wrote:
It is not only about having a page that list the
commercial support companies. It's more about a deep collaboration
between the foundation and the companies that live from GNOME.
I personally
On 23/05/11 15:28, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
Martyn Russellmar...@lanedo.com a écrit:
On 23/05/11 12:02, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 09:29 +0200, Lionel Dricot wrote:
It is not only about having a page that list the
commercial support companies. It's more about a deep
On 23/05/11 15:08, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
Martyn Russellmar...@lanedo.com a écrit:
That's always needed too of course, but when you have potential
customers asking who can provide support for projects X, Y and Z, do
you really want to be in a position where you have no answer?
Oh, you mean
On 12/03/13 13:38, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Tue, 2013-03-12 at 09:26 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Hey,
On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 10:03 -0400, Shaun McCance wrote:
Hi all,
I think it's clear from the recent thread that most people had
no idea we had a Jabber server, or that they could get accounts
On 13/03/13 23:22, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 09:26:33AM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
to maintain the OpenFire Jabber server. First, as Olav mentioned,
there's no SSL support for a service where you would expect privacy.
There is SSL. Just that:
1) they broke it in a newer
On 07/01/2013 05:56 AM, Hu Zheng wrote:
Can your tell me your paypal account? I want to donate some money to gtk
project!
As far as I am aware there is no PayPal account for the project
specifically. AFAICS, your options are to either donate to the GNOME
project or to the GIMP project -
14 matches
Mail list logo
