On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Seif Lotfy s...@lotfy.com wrote:
So many different point of views and ideas in the community that are
not well discussed. The first thing that pops up in my head is GNOME
OS. But then I am kinda lost. Maybe this is something we need to
discuss here on the
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 13:45, Alan Cox a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk wrote:
People asked to have their blogs included on it and placed them on
it by choice. It's under CC-NC licensing (*). So they've agreed to NC use
but the foundation exploiting it commercially (or indeed any site
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 15:25, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote:
About Support GNOME: we don't currently have this, but it seems pretty
essential to me. I'm sure there are plenty of items that I've missed.
Tell me what!
I stopped working on the FoG videos here  because the FoG site was
On Jan 22, 2011 12:04 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Le vendredi 21 janvier 2011, à 23:41 +0800, Frederic Muller a écrit :
So Hackfest registration is happening here:
http://live.gnome.org/Hackfests/GNOME.Asia2011 , call for papers for
the conference is here
Someone left their charger for their laptop in the MIT Media Lab space. We
discovered it as we were cleaning up for the day and so it could have been
left behind at any point.
I have it and would gladly ship it to whomever is missing it. Just contact
me off-list and describe it.
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:18 PM, Jim Gettys j...@freedesktop.org wrote:
The combination of technologies going under the name HTML 5 have made/are
making web technology based applications finally competitive with those
built using conventional toolkits such as Qt, GTK+, and the Windows and Mac
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Tobias Mueller mue...@cryptobitch.dewrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1On 15.12.2009 15:50, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
No, do not detract it. There's a reason there's a debian-devel-private
and a kde-private.
According to Jeff
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org wrote:
Given the excellent comments so far, I'm leaning towards retracting the
proposal. However, there's quite a few others who support it now. So I let
it move forward naturally.
No, do not detract it. There's a reason
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Murray Cumming murr...@murrayc.comwrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 09:50 -0600, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
This is about signal-to-noise ratio, not
about keeping secrets.
So why not just moderate the list?
Because part of increasing signal-to-noise is giving
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Dave Neary dne...@gnome.org wrote:
It seems like the issue isn't making people promise to be nice, it's
what happens when they aren't. And once again the board has taken the
easy way out, by not being judgemental about reported behaviour.
In this case, I'd
That is why the proposal that I just put on the table explicitly talks only
of official GNOME forums of communication which is, incidentally, exactly
like a terms of service.
2009/11/25 john palmieri john.j5.palmi...@gmail.com
I'm against an enshrined code of conduct which suddenly kicks you
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Philip Van Hoof pvanh...@gnome.orgwrote:
I (fully) agree with John here.
The lawyer-talk proposal of Jason is a no for me personally.
It's also not the document that I've put my name under when I signed the
Code of Conduct any longer if that amendment is
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Philip Van Hoof pvanh...@gnome.orgwrote:
I don't like the entire intention of enforcement.
The intention is improving our community quality. The method is what you
disagree with. What alternative method would you propose?
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org wrote:
To make the discussion more practical, lets take one real incident of the
past: Murray's blog re Jeff. It did not include vulgar language. It did
include exaggerations that turned into libel. Now how does any
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org wrote:
On 11/25/2009 02:18 PM, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org
To make the discussion more practical, lets take one real incident
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org wrote:
I also like to see two more ideas added to CoC:
- Learn to agree to disagree.
- Criticize ideas, not people presenting them.
Back to the Murray case, with my recommendation, everything would have
happened the way
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
There is no official enforcement of these principles
unless the CoC gets an official enforcement (and this paragraph is
removed) any requirement on having members sign the CoC page is a
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Diego Escalante Urrelo
The Board would like to know if there's interest for such a meeting. The
agenda would be composed of proposed items.
A proposed time for this would be September 24th at 17 UTC.
Yes, but please choose a date on a
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Dave Neary dne...@gnome.org wrote:
What do you expect from the foundation?
Leadership. I want there to never be another DVCS mutli-year long flame war.
The only reason it ended is that Red Hat has the people, servers and
bandwidth to JFDI for something of
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Diego Escalante Urrelo die...@gnome.org wrote:
Could you add information to this page about the agreed upon
reimbursement rates? There was a discussion about this in February and
it seemed that there was some argument as
When I last asked about this on Feb. 11th, the response was wait a
week or two:
I asked again two weeks ago in the GUADEC IRC channel and someone--I
can't recall who--said that something was in progress. So what's up?
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Olav Vitters o...@bkor.dhs.org wrote:
That isn't a contest. It is a survey.
Please don't read more in to my email than I intended. There's no need
to get defensive.
seems to me that a lot of
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 2:43 AM, Karl Lattimer k...@qdh.org.uk wrote:
Elijah Newren did an initial analysis of the data. His analysis also
the survey questions and answers. Find it at:
This is pretty decent
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 11:48 AM, John Carr john.c...@unrouted.co.uk wrote:
I'm not a complete idiot - if it was going to be a degraded,
bastardized form of Git I wouldn't waste my time on it. I suppose I
might be an evil genius stalling for Bazaar DS9 to be written (sorry
for the very bad joke
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) zee...@gmail.com wrote:
How about we set-up a task-force of volunteers who would want to
help in the move, each volunteer promising at least 3 hours a week? 3
hours is a very small amount of time but I am hoping that we'll be
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Luca Ferretti firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
bzr allows lightweight checkouts . What about git?
Yes, it does. This is not an issue.
foundation-list mailing list
Mail list logo