Re: GNOME now

2012-11-16 Thread Jason D. Clinton
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Seif Lotfy s...@lotfy.com wrote: So many different point of views and ideas in the community that are not well discussed. The first thing that pops up in my head is GNOME OS. But then I am kinda lost. Maybe this is something we need to discuss here on the

Re: Readability publisher sign-up for *.gnome.org

2011-08-26 Thread Jason D. Clinton
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 13:45, Alan Cox a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk wrote: People asked to have their blogs included on it and placed them on it by choice. It's under CC-NC licensing (*). So they've agreed to NC use but the foundation exploiting it commercially (or indeed any site reformatting it

Re: About GNOME, Support GNOME

2011-03-21 Thread Jason D. Clinton
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 15:25, Allan Day allanp...@gmail.com wrote: About Support GNOME: we don't currently have this, but it seems pretty essential to me. I'm sure there are plenty of items that I've missed. Tell me what! I stopped working on the FoG videos here [1] because the FoG site was

Re: Official announcement and invitation to GNOME 3.0 Hackfest and GNOME.Asia Summit 2011

2011-01-22 Thread Jason D. Clinton
On Jan 22, 2011 12:04 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote: Le vendredi 21 janvier 2011, à 23:41 +0800, Frederic Muller a écrit : So Hackfest registration is happening here: http://live.gnome.org/Hackfests/GNOME.Asia2011 , call for papers for the conference is here

Boston Summit laptop charger found

2010-11-08 Thread Jason D. Clinton
Someone left their charger for their laptop in the MIT Media Lab space. We discovered it as we were cleaning up for the day and so it could have been left behind at any point. I have it and would gladly ship it to whomever is missing it. Just contact me off-list and describe it.

Re: Reboot: Strategic goals for GNOME

2010-03-03 Thread Jason D. Clinton
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:18 PM, Jim Gettys j...@freedesktop.org wrote: The combination of technologies going under the name HTML 5 have made/are making web technology based applications finally competitive with those built using conventional toolkits such as Qt, GTK+, and the Windows and Mac

Re: Private Foundation-List Petition for referendum

2009-12-16 Thread Jason D. Clinton
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Tobias Mueller mue...@cryptobitch.dewrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1On 15.12.2009 15:50, Jason D. Clinton wrote: No, do not detract it. There's a reason there's a debian-devel-private and a kde-private. According to Jeff

Re: Private Foundation-List Petition for referendum

2009-12-15 Thread Jason D. Clinton
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org wrote: Given the excellent comments so far, I'm leaning towards retracting the proposal. However, there's quite a few others who support it now. So I let it move forward naturally. No, do not detract it. There's a reason

Re: Private Foundation-List Petition for referendum

2009-12-15 Thread Jason D. Clinton
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Murray Cumming murr...@murrayc.comwrote: On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 09:50 -0600, Jason D. Clinton wrote: This is about signal-to-noise ratio, not about keeping secrets. So why not just moderate the list? Because part of increasing signal-to-noise is giving

Re: Code of Conduct and Foundation membership

2009-11-25 Thread Jason D. Clinton
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Dave Neary dne...@gnome.org wrote: It seems like the issue isn't making people promise to be nice, it's what happens when they aren't. And once again the board has taken the easy way out, by not being judgemental about reported behaviour. In this case, I'd

Re: Code of Conduct and Foundation membership

2009-11-25 Thread Jason D. Clinton
That is why the proposal that I just put on the table explicitly talks only of official GNOME forums of communication which is, incidentally, exactly like a terms of service. 2009/11/25 john palmieri john.j5.palmi...@gmail.com I'm against an enshrined code of conduct which suddenly kicks you

Re: Code of Conduct and Foundation membership

2009-11-25 Thread Jason D. Clinton
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Philip Van Hoof pvanh...@gnome.orgwrote: I (fully) agree with John here. The lawyer-talk proposal of Jason is a no for me personally. It's also not the document that I've put my name under when I signed the Code of Conduct any longer if that amendment is

Re: Code of Conduct and Foundation membership

2009-11-25 Thread Jason D. Clinton
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Philip Van Hoof pvanh...@gnome.orgwrote: I don't like the entire intention of enforcement. The intention is improving our community quality. The method is what you disagree with. What alternative method would you propose?

Re: Code of Conduct and Foundation membership

2009-11-25 Thread Jason D. Clinton
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org wrote: To make the discussion more practical, lets take one real incident of the past: Murray's blog re Jeff. It did not include vulgar language. It did include exaggerations that turned into libel. Now how does any

Re: Code of Conduct and Foundation membership

2009-11-25 Thread Jason D. Clinton
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org wrote: On 11/25/2009 02:18 PM, Jason D. Clinton wrote: On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org mailto:beh...@behdad.org wrote: To make the discussion more practical, lets take one real incident

Re: Code of Conduct and Foundation membership

2009-11-25 Thread Jason D. Clinton
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org wrote: I also like to see two more ideas added to CoC: - Learn to agree to disagree. - Criticize ideas, not people presenting them. Back to the Murray case, with my recommendation, everything would have happened the way

Re: Meeting Minutes Published - October 29, 2009

2009-11-24 Thread Jason D. Clinton
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote: There is no official enforcement of these principles unless the CoC gets an official enforcement (and this paragraph is removed) any requirement on having members sign the CoC page is a pointless exercise. What kind

Re: IRC Foundation meeting?

2009-09-13 Thread Jason D. Clinton
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Diego Escalante Urrelo die...@gnome.orgwrote: The Board would like to know if there's interest for such a meeting. The agenda would be composed of proposed items. A proposed time for this would be September 24th at 17 UTC. Yes, but please choose a date on a

Re: So what do people *except* me want from the foundation?

2009-06-02 Thread Jason D. Clinton
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Dave Neary dne...@gnome.org wrote: What do you expect from the foundation? Leadership. I want there to never be another DVCS mutli-year long flame war. The only reason it ended is that Red Hat has the people, servers and bandwidth to JFDI for something of

Re: The Travel Committee is ready!

2009-04-08 Thread Jason D. Clinton
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Diego Escalante Urrelo die...@gnome.org wrote:  http://live.gnome.org/Travel (carefully!) Could you add information to this page about the agreed upon reimbursement rates? There was a discussion about this in February and it seemed that there was some argument as

Travel assistance for Gran Canaria

2009-04-05 Thread Jason D. Clinton
When I last asked about this on Feb. 11th, the response was wait a week or two: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/foundation-list/2009-February/msg00013.html I asked again two weeks ago in the GUADEC IRC channel and someone--I can't recall who--said that something was in progress. So what's up? The

Re: GNOME DVCS Survey Results

2009-01-04 Thread Jason D. Clinton
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Olav Vitters o...@bkor.dhs.org wrote: That isn't a contest. It is a survey. Please don't read more in to my email than I intended. There's no need to get defensive. http://www.gnome.org/~shaunm/survey/first-picks-permutations.png It seems to me that a lot of

Re: GNOME DVCS Survey Results

2009-01-04 Thread Jason D. Clinton
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 2:43 AM, Karl Lattimer k...@qdh.org.uk wrote: Elijah Newren did an initial analysis of the data. His analysis also includes the survey questions and answers. Find it at: http://blogs.gnome.org/newren/2009/01/03/gnome-dvcs-survey-results/ This is pretty decent

Re: GNOME DVCS Survey Results

2009-01-04 Thread Jason D. Clinton
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 11:48 AM, John Carr john.c...@unrouted.co.uk wrote: I'm not a complete idiot - if it was going to be a degraded, bastardized form of Git I wouldn't waste my time on it. I suppose I might be an evil genius stalling for Bazaar DS9 to be written (sorry for the very bad joke

Re: GNOME DVCS Survey Results

2009-01-04 Thread Jason D. Clinton
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) zee...@gmail.com wrote: How about we set-up a task-force of volunteers who would want to help in the move, each volunteer promising at least 3 hours a week? 3 hours is a very small amount of time but I am hoping that we'll be able to

Re: GNOME DVCS Survey Results

2009-01-04 Thread Jason D. Clinton
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Luca Ferretti elle@libero.it wrote: bzr allows lightweight checkouts [1]. What about git? Yes, it does. This is not an issue. ___ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org