On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 09:05 -0800, Lefty (石鏡 ) wrote:
On 3/5/10 8:44 AM, David Schlesinger le...@shugendo.org wrote:
If everything gets done inside or through your browser, it would make
toolkits such as GTK and desktop environments such as GNOME obsolete,
except as platforms for a
On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 03:11 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 04:02 +0200, Zeeshan Ali wrote:
Hi everyone,
I don't think we need ethics-teachings about this. We GNOME
programmers know. We do.
I can't say for others but I for one find it extremely insulting when
On Sun, 2010-01-17 at 17:55 -0800, Lefty (石鏡 ) wrote:
We use the terms open and open source elsewhere, and it hasn't created
particular controversy, or visibly pushed us in the direction of
proprietary software, as far as I can tell. Why is it controversial here in
particular?
As far as I an
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 08:33 -0800, Lefty (石鏡 ) wrote:
On 12/13/09 8:22 AM, Richard Stallman r...@gnu.org wrote:
Unable to come up with and too dumb are your own additions,
which clearly were not present in the events themselves.
Clearly, a lot of misunderstanding was present in the
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Thomas Thurman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's something I think might be useful:
If we had a list of where everyone attending aKademy and GUADEC will
come from (which might be decently approximated by seeing where they
came from last year), we can then
On Sat, 2008-02-16 at 10:53 -0500, Luis Villa wrote:
[Speaking purely as a Foundation member and not as a member of the
Board; I've not discussed this with the Board at all.]
Some years ago the Foundation considered the use of preferential
voting to select the board. At the time I opposed
On 10/16/07, Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Quim Gil wrote:
What happens when you get less than 7 people with votes?
I don't understand - you mean if there are fewer than 7 candidates?
Constitutional crisis, I suppose... everyone's elected, and they invite
specific people to
On 4/13/07, Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 13:42 -0400, Dan Winship wrote:
Seriously though, this surprise announcement stuff is exactly the sort
of behavior that the community despises when Novell[1] and Red Hat[2] do
it, and now we're doing it to
On 4/13/07, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quote who=Jonathon Jongsma
There may be legitimate reasons for some degree of secrecy, but there is
no information for us as foundation members to judge for ourselves whether
that secrecy is warranted. It essentially all boils down to: trust
On 4/13/07, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quote who=Jonathon Jongsma
I'm saying that I believe the secrecy is clearly and *obviously* warranted
in these cases, simply due to the nature of the examples. We can't give you
sensitive employment information after the fact so you can determine
10 matches
Mail list logo
