Re: GNOME DVCS Survey Results

[Karl Lattimer]

 Elijah Newren did an initial analysis of the data.  His analysis also includes
 the survey questions and answers.  Find it at:
 
   http://blogs.gnome.org/newren/2009/01/03/gnome-dvcs-survey-results/
 

This is pretty decent analysis going on here :) 

I'd like to remind people of John Carr's recent blog post too, someone 
mentioned in the survey results actually. JC has been working on bzr with git 
protocol support, which would fulfil many of the requirements for having a 
GNOME DVCS.

Happy new year everyone :)

BR,
 K

___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list

Re: [guadec-list] Re-considering expectnation web service

[Karl Lattimer]

On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 17:24 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
 On Sun, 2007-12-30 at 23:09 +0200, Baris Cicek wrote:
  And whatever we do we need to do it quickly
 
 You are not going to put together a completely new system in time, using
 Drupal or anything else. That's not your fault and you shouldn't be
 punished for it. You probably do have time to try Expectnation and to
 configure it as you need. If you choose to waste time twiddling with
 ideologically-sound systems then the masses will blame you (rather than
 the zealots who persuaded you) for it later.
 

I agree 100% here, just because we're supposed to have an ideology of
free software doesn't mean we should be against using non-free software.
Hell, dreamweaver is an awesome product! This logic extends further that
if we are able to help Expectnation become open source (as a previous
post suggested), then the way to do that is to embrace it now...
Especially as it has features which are invaluable to GUADEC being a
success in 2008!

K,


___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list