or aloof at times and they
may also appear hostile to others but it rarely is a problem really -
its part and parcel of any community
Gnome is generally a happy place IMO and I dont think the board needs to
act in this area yet
jamie
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 10:45 -0600, Stormy Peters wrote:
So
will
be 1.1 which will have the above plug-in functionality defined
As always, lack of time is making progress on Xesam slow atm but its
getting there
jamie
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo
On Sun, 2007-11-25 at 12:18 -0500, Jody Goldberg wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 12:56:09PM +, jamie wrote:
MOOX is most likely to become irrelevant IMO
Not agreed.
its debatable and subjective - yes. I reject the notion its a foregone
conclusion that MS gets its way however
On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 04:45 +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=jamie
In any event I dont understand why the gnome foundation was pulled into
this - cant you do your work with ECMA without foundation backing?
As explained in the statement, the GNOME Foundation joined ECMA as a
non-profit
