Re: clarification and apology [was Re: board]

2007-11-08 Thread Diego Escalante Urrelo
On 11/8/07, Quim Gil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Nov 8, 2007 7:44 PM, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  apologies for the impression I may have
  created about the current board.

 No problem, Luis. I don't think the board members got bad feelings for
 your constructive and rather justified criticism.

 Man, we love you!


Yes! GNOME Friend with benefits!

wait a second...
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list


Re: clarification and apology [was Re: board]

2007-11-08 Thread Dave Neary
Hi,

Luis Villa wrote:
 Since March of this year, I've been trying to help out on a variety of
 miscellaneous Foundation-related legal projects- some important, some
 not so much. All of these projects, for various reasons, stalled. When
 I came back up to speed, I tried to revive them, but got blocked on
 the two new legal-lists- in each case, I asked for status or for more
 information, and got little information, or worse, complete silence.
 As most of you know this is incredibly demotivating for a volunteer.

...

 Very few board members were on the
 lists, and the board expected the board's delegates to serve as a
 conduit for this type of information. Unfortunately, for whatever
 reasons, this did not happen, so the board as a whole was unaware of
 my unanswered pings, and did not deserve some of the negative energy I
 channeled in their direction.

It seems appropriate that the board delegate to these lists explain
themselves in the light of your mail.

Cheers,
Dave.

-- 
Dave Neary
GNOME Foundation member
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list