Re: Addition to the Code of Conduct (was Re: Code of Conduct and Foundation membership)
On 12/14/2009 05:26 PM, Pierre-Luc Beaudoin wrote: On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 22:56 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: Should we just version the Code of Conduct? Or is this a non-issue? I believe we don't need to update the Code since those 2 additions are expected behaviours from the existing "Be respectful and considerate" element. Maybe should these 2 additions be added to a list of example behaviours that serve the code? Makes more sense. behdad Pierre-Luc ___ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
Re: Addition to the Code of Conduct (was Re: Code of Conduct and Foundation membership)
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 22:56 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: > Should we just version the Code of Conduct? Or is this > a non-issue? I believe we don't need to update the Code since those 2 additions are expected behaviours from the existing "Be respectful and considerate" element. Maybe should these 2 additions be added to a list of example behaviours that serve the code? Pierre-Luc signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
Addition to the Code of Conduct (was Re: Code of Conduct and Foundation membership)
Le mercredi 25 novembre 2009, à 17:35 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit : > I also like to see two more ideas added to CoC: > > - Learn to agree to disagree. > > - Criticize ideas, not people presenting them. I support this change. I'm just unsure how we can update the Code of Conduct, since people signed the "old" version and we obviously can't pretend they approved those additions. Should we just version the Code of Conduct? Or is this a non-issue? Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. ___ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
