On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 19:27 +0300, Baris Cicek wrote:
> Hi all;
>
> Murray asked on membership-committee list if we should ask to
> prospective members these questions, which are optional to answer:
> gender, to track lack of female involvement;
Hopefully, to track increased involvement.
> nati
On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 18:35 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Baris Cicek wrote:
> > Murray asked on membership-committee list if we should ask to
> > prospective members these questions, which are optional to answer:
> > gender, to track lack of female involvement;
> > nationality, to track lack
Hi,
Baris Cicek wrote:
> Murray asked on membership-committee list if we should ask to
> prospective members these questions, which are optional to answer:
> gender, to track lack of female involvement;
> nationality, to track lack of Asian involvement;
I have no problems with these.
> And one
Hi all;
Murray asked on membership-committee list if we should ask to
prospective members these questions, which are optional to answer:
gender, to track lack of female involvement;
nationality, to track lack of Asian involvement;
And one more can be:
public key, we can encrypt ballots in future
