GNOME Q4 2009 Quarterly report

2010-02-03 Thread Stormy Peters
The GNOME Foundation would like to present the Q4 2009 Quarterly reporthttp://foundation.gnome.org/reports/gnome-report-2009-Q4.pdf[1] (HTML versionhttp://foundation.gnome.org/reports/gnome-report-2009-Q4.html[2]). Q4 is normally a quiet quarter — but not for GNOME! During Q4 we had our annual

Re: GNOME Q4 2009 Quarterly report

2010-02-03 Thread Stormy Peters
Corrected links: [1] http://foundation.gnome.org/reports/gnome-report-2009-Q4.pdfhttp://foundation.gnome.org/reports/gnome-report-2009-Q3.pdf [2] http://foundation.gnome.org/reports/gnome-report-2009-Q4.htmlhttp://foundation.gnome.org/reports/gnome-report-2009-Q3.html On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at

Re: [adboard] GNOME Q4 2009 Quarterly report

2010-02-03 Thread Behdad Esfahbod
The correct links: http://foundation.gnome.org/reports/gnome-report-2009-Q4.pdf http://foundation.gnome.org/reports/gnome-report-2009-Q4.html behdad On 02/03/2010 01:27 PM, Stormy Peters wrote: Corrected links: [1] http://foundation.gnome.org/reports/gnome-report-2009-Q4.pdf

Re: GNOME Q4 2009 Quarterly report

2010-02-03 Thread Diego Escalante Urrelo
Hi! Just wanted to say three things: 1. Thank you to everyone that has contributed to GNOME in Q4, as hackers, testers, evangelists, friends of gnome! You make it possible, thanks! 2. Thanks to the teams for providing this really good feedback 3. I seem unable to open links in the PDF file.

Re: GNOME Q4 2009 Quarterly report

2010-02-03 Thread Vinicius Depizzol
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 23:41, Diego Escalante Urrelo die...@gnome.org wrote:  3. I seem unable to open links in the PDF file. Is it me, my evince, or the file itself? Anyone has a clue? Great work, thanks again! :-) Hey Diego! Well, it is not you nor your evince :). The current way we do