Re: GNOME logo issue

2009-03-04 Thread Luis Villa
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Andre Klapper wrote: > Am Montag, den 02.02.2009, 20:07 -0500 schrieb Luis Villa: >> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Luis Villa wrote: >> > On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Dave Neary wrote: >> >> Just replying to what I said back in 2006 (I'll let someone else t

Re: GNOME logo issue

2009-03-04 Thread Andre Klapper
Am Montag, den 02.02.2009, 20:07 -0500 schrieb Luis Villa: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Luis Villa wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Dave Neary wrote: > >> Just replying to what I said back in 2006 (I'll let someone else take > >> care of it this time) - I'm not sure if we'd get t

Re: GNOME logo issue

2009-02-02 Thread Luis Villa
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Luis Villa wrote: > On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Dave Neary wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Shaun McCance wrote: >>> On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 19:27 +0100, Dave Neary wrote: Selon Claudio Saavedra : > http://www.randomimage.us/ > > I think that would be some

Re: GNOME logo issue

2009-01-11 Thread Luis Villa
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Luis Villa wrote: > On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Dave Neary wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Shaun McCance wrote: >>> On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 19:27 +0100, Dave Neary wrote: Selon Claudio Saavedra : > http://www.randomimage.us/ > > I think that would be some

Re: GNOME logo issue

2009-01-11 Thread Luis Villa
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Dave Neary wrote: > Hi, > > Shaun McCance wrote: >> On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 19:27 +0100, Dave Neary wrote: >>> Selon Claudio Saavedra : http://www.randomimage.us/ I think that would be some kind of copyright infringment (IANAL). >>> Thanks for the head

Re: GNOME logo issue

2009-01-06 Thread Dave Neary
Hi, Shaun McCance wrote: > On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 19:27 +0100, Dave Neary wrote: >> Selon Claudio Saavedra : >>> http://www.randomimage.us/ >>> >>> I think that would be some kind of copyright infringment (IANAL). >> Thanks for the heads-up. In this instance, it is a case of trademark >> infringeme

Re: GNOME logo issue

2009-01-06 Thread Shaun McCance
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 19:27 +0100, Dave Neary wrote: > Hi Claudio, > > Selon Claudio Saavedra : > > I don't know if the Foundation is already aware of this, but please > > check the logo of the following webpage: > > > > http://www.randomimage.us/ > > > > I think that would be some kind of copyrig

Re: GNOME logo issue

2006-01-11 Thread Dave Neary
Hi Claudio, Selon Claudio Saavedra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I don't know if the Foundation is already aware of this, but please > check the logo of the following webpage: > > http://www.randomimage.us/ > > I think that would be some kind of copyright infringment (IANAL). Thanks for the heads-up. I

Re: GNOME logo issue

2006-01-11 Thread Bill Haneman
Claudio Saavedra wrote: Hi, I don't know if the Foundation is already aware of this, but please check the logo of the following webpage: http://www.randomimage.us/ I think that would be some kind of copyright infringment (IANAL). I think this is a good case for why we should continue to ke

GNOME logo issue

2006-01-11 Thread Claudio Saavedra
Hi, I don't know if the Foundation is already aware of this, but please check the logo of the following webpage: http://www.randomimage.us/ I think that would be some kind of copyright infringment (IANAL). Claudio -- Claudio Saavedra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __