On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Andre Klapper wrote:
> Am Montag, den 02.02.2009, 20:07 -0500 schrieb Luis Villa:
>> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Luis Villa wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Dave Neary wrote:
>> >> Just replying to what I said back in 2006 (I'll let someone else t
Am Montag, den 02.02.2009, 20:07 -0500 schrieb Luis Villa:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Luis Villa wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Dave Neary wrote:
> >> Just replying to what I said back in 2006 (I'll let someone else take
> >> care of it this time) - I'm not sure if we'd get t
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Luis Villa wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Dave Neary wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Shaun McCance wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 19:27 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
Selon Claudio Saavedra :
> http://www.randomimage.us/
>
> I think that would be some
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Luis Villa wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Dave Neary wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Shaun McCance wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 19:27 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
Selon Claudio Saavedra :
> http://www.randomimage.us/
>
> I think that would be some
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Dave Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Shaun McCance wrote:
>> On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 19:27 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
>>> Selon Claudio Saavedra :
http://www.randomimage.us/
I think that would be some kind of copyright infringment (IANAL).
>>> Thanks for the head
Hi,
Shaun McCance wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 19:27 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
>> Selon Claudio Saavedra :
>>> http://www.randomimage.us/
>>>
>>> I think that would be some kind of copyright infringment (IANAL).
>> Thanks for the heads-up. In this instance, it is a case of trademark
>> infringeme
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 19:27 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
> Hi Claudio,
>
> Selon Claudio Saavedra :
> > I don't know if the Foundation is already aware of this, but please
> > check the logo of the following webpage:
> >
> > http://www.randomimage.us/
> >
> > I think that would be some kind of copyrig
Hi Claudio,
Selon Claudio Saavedra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I don't know if the Foundation is already aware of this, but please
> check the logo of the following webpage:
>
> http://www.randomimage.us/
>
> I think that would be some kind of copyright infringment (IANAL).
Thanks for the heads-up. I
Claudio Saavedra wrote:
Hi,
I don't know if the Foundation is already aware of this, but please
check the logo of the following webpage:
http://www.randomimage.us/
I think that would be some kind of copyright infringment (IANAL).
I think this is a good case for why we should continue to ke
Hi,
I don't know if the Foundation is already aware of this, but please
check the logo of the following webpage:
http://www.randomimage.us/
I think that would be some kind of copyright infringment (IANAL).
Claudio
--
Claudio Saavedra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
__
10 matches
Mail list logo