Murray,
I deeply regret if I made impression of any kind of "thought police".
All I wanted was clarity and unambiguity (=unequivocalness).
Regards,
Sergey
On Nov 15, 2007 4:13 PM, Murray Cumming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 08:12 -0300, Bruno Boaventura wrote:
> > On N
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 08:12 -0300, Bruno Boaventura wrote:
> On Nov 14, 2007 2:53 PM, Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That is a legitimate approach, and it can be helpful as you say.
> > However, those precise words are subject to the reading, not intended,
> > which Sergey saw in
On Nov 14, 2007 2:53 PM, Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is a legitimate approach, and it can be helpful as you say.
> However, those precise words are subject to the reading, not intended,
> which Sergey saw in them. Perhaps a rewording, or a link to
> http://www.gnu.org/philos
The first term is the
preferred/correct one while the one in brackets helps connecting a
phrase familiar to many people. I personally don't have any problem
with either one.
That is a legitimate approach, and it can be helpful as you say.
However, those precise words are subject
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 22:02 +, Sergey Udaltsov wrote:
> Hello people,
>
> I just looked at the foundation front page
> http://foundation.gnome.org/ and found somewhat strange sentense:
>
> > GNOME is part of the GNU Project, and is Free Software (sometimes referred
> > to as Open Source sof
Hello people,
I just looked at the foundation front page
http://foundation.gnome.org/ and found somewhat strange sentense:
> GNOME is part of the GNU Project, and is Free Software (sometimes referred
> to as Open Source software).
Don't you think that for a project wich is the part of the GNU
