On 9/14/05, Quim Gil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Let's be very clear- we have a conference for hackers that interests
> > several hundred people, and we have a separate conference for business
> > and government that interests dozens, and there is very little overlap
> > between those two gro
> Let's be very clear- we have a conference for hackers that interests
> several hundred people, and we have a separate conference for business
> and government that interests dozens, and there is very little overlap
> between those two groups. I'm not clear why we continue to insist that
> they b
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 00:19 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
> For 1/2 the cost, we could run summit-style (low-cost, high-fun)
> events on every continent (including a big one in Europe as the
> 'mother ship'), and for 1/4 the cost, we could send a handful of GNOME
> community leaders to every major
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 00:11 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
> On 9/8/05, Tim Ney, GNOME Foundation <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 09:34 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
> >
> > > a large portion of the attendees were either completely uninterested
> > > in the first two days, or comple
On 9/7/05, Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Besides these obvious flaws, I'd really hate to see fundamental
> > tinkering with things like this while we still don't have a basic idea
> > of what the heck GUADEC is and who it is meant to be for.
> > I think the GUADEC planners need to co
On 9/8/05, Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Tim Ney, GNOME Foundation a écrit :
> > On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 16:05 +0200, Quim Gil wrote:
> >>For some the GUADEC is an opportunity to meet, for others is a way to
> >>get new contributors, for others is a way to get some money for the
On 9/8/05, Tim Ney, GNOME Foundation <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 09:34 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
>
> > a large portion of the attendees were either completely uninterested
> > in the first two days, or completely uninterested in the 3rd.
>
> The evaluation forms submitted st
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 10:05 +0100, Bill Haneman wrote:
> I don't think we should eliminate the enterprise or government outreach
> aspects of GUADEC - think how important deployments like Extremadura
> have been (or should have been). However I think we should focus that
> outreach to take adv
I don't think we should eliminate the enterprise or government outreach
aspects of GUADEC - think how important deployments like Extremadura
have been (or should have been). However I think we should focus that
outreach to take advantage of our strengths.
In that way, enterprises and/or gover
Hi,
Tim Ney, GNOME Foundation a écrit :
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 16:05 +0200, Quim Gil wrote:
For some the GUADEC is an opportunity to meet, for others is a way to
get new contributors, for others is a way to get some money for the
Foundation, for others is a way to enhance a common vision of GNO
> That's a fair summary of what the board has discussed, as recently as
> June. Jonathan Blandford once termed GUADEC as GNOME's mothership, an
> annual place to meet and recharge batteries.
This is an insiders' point of view and this is possibly a reason why the
GUADEC satisfy generally insider
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 16:05 +0200, Quim Gil wrote:
> For some the GUADEC is an opportunity to meet, for others is a way to
> get new contributors, for others is a way to get some money for the
> Foundation, for others is a way to enhance a common vision of GNOME, for
> others
That's a fair su
> Deciding what GUADEC is for is harder. Changing the name should be easy.
As you see is not that easy. :)
Also, what is most important about a change is not the fact of being
easy or harder, but being useful and worth to change.
I don't think it's worth deciding a change for GUADEC's name befo
Hi,
Luis Villa a écrit :
On 9/5/05, David Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1. There is no link to GNOME in the name, or to being a conference
In both the current name and the proposed name, you have a G, that's
it. So if this is the problem, the proposed new name doesn't solve it.
I'm sold
14 matches
Mail list logo
