I think it is nice to have a choice for this specific purpose, but it is
not mandatory. Delaying the process is not going to make people more
exciting to participate,
There may be a misunderstanding. What I proposed is not a delay.
What I proposed is a reminder/request, We want
On Thu, May 23, 2013 4:57 pm, Richard Stallman wrote:
It is not a good thing when there are so few candidates
that nearly all have to be elected. With just 8 candidates
and a 7-member board, we are only voting about which single
one of these candidate not to put on the board. That is getting
My point about the candidates this time
being really strong is that I think there were a few people who were
thinking of running but who decided not to run against the people who had
already put themselves forward.
That is unfortunate. The members ought to have the choice.
I
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Karen Sandler ka...@gnome.org wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 4:57 pm, Richard Stallman wrote:
It is not a good thing when there are so few candidates
that nearly all have to be elected. With just 8 candidates
and a 7-member board, we are only voting about
On Sat, 2013-05-25 at 15:23 -0400, Richard Stallman wrote:
My point about the candidates this time
being really strong is that I think there were a few people who were
thinking of running but who decided not to run against the people who had
already put themselves forward.
That
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Germán Póo-Caamaño g...@gnome.org wrote:
On Sat, 2013-05-25 at 15:23 -0400, Richard Stallman wrote:
IMHO, for many people is not clear what the board of directors does and
its limitations. Neither what it should be expected for a director nor
what could be
It is not a good thing when there are so few candidates
that nearly all have to be elected. With just 8 candidates
and a 7-member board, we are only voting about which single
one of these candidate not to put on the board. That is getting
pretty close to no choice at all. What would we do if
Seems like a valid point.
p.s. not saying the current candidates are not valid or worthy :)
p.s.s. a valid point that this year we should continue as is. It isn't fair to
the ones that have submitted their candidacy on time.
--
Jared Jennings
On Thursday, May 23, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Richard
Fully agreed Richard, these items are on the Membership Committee's agenda
for the next meeting already.
2013/5/23 Richard Stallman r...@gnu.org
It is not a good thing when there are so few candidates
that nearly all have to be elected. With just 8 candidates
and a 7-member board, we are
On 05/21/2013 10:46 PM, Karen Sandler wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2013 1:14 pm, Richard Stallman wrote:
The number of candidates so far is pretty small -- I saw only 8 -- so
we will not have much choice in our voting.
On general principles, and not as criticism of the people who have
already
2013/5/22 Joanmarie Diggs jdi...@igalia.com
On 05/21/2013 10:46 PM, Karen Sandler wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2013 1:14 pm, Richard Stallman wrote:
The number of candidates so far is pretty small -- I saw only 8 -- so
we will not have much choice in our voting.
On general principles, and
Forgot the links:
[1] https://vote.gnome.org/2012/rules.html
[2] https://vote.gnome.org/2013/rules.html
2013/5/22 Andrea Veri a...@gnome.org
2013/5/22 Joanmarie Diggs jdi...@igalia.com
On 05/21/2013 10:46 PM, Karen Sandler wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2013 1:14 pm, Richard Stallman wrote:
The
The number of candidates so far is pretty small -- I saw only 8 -- so
we will not have much choice in our voting.
On general principles, and not as criticism of the people who have
already stepped into the race, I think it would be good for more
people to run. I encourage you, and everyone who
What happened?
Dave.
On May 20, 2013 5:55 PM, seiflo...@googlemail.com seiflo...@gmail.com
wrote:
I hereby withdraw my candidacy for the board of directors. I think I will
not bring to the table as much as what the other candidates can bring. I
wish them all the best.
Cheers
Seif
14 matches
Mail list logo
