Re: Survey: GUADEC and Akadamy co-location in 2011

2010-02-03 Thread Dave Neary
Hi, john palmieri wrote: > "Just do it" is the wrong attitude. We "Just did it" last year and it > was a mess. A mess is a little harsh. Let's say it reminded me of earlier conferences where some stuff fell through the cracks. We had organisational issues and communication issues, and (as you po

FOSDEM booth

2010-02-03 Thread Lionel Dricot
Hello Gnome-lovers, This week-end is the FOSDEM weekend in Bruxelles. We have a GNOME booth in main hall which is organized by Bertrand Rousseau (Getting Things GNOME developer but not foundation member yet). He's currently looking for some volunteer to man the booth during some parts of the FO

Re: Survey: GUADEC and Akadamy co-location in 2011

2010-02-03 Thread Philip Van Hoof
On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 09:49 +0100, Dave Neary wrote: Hey! > john palmieri wrote: > > "Just do it" is the wrong attitude. We "Just did it" last year and it > > was a mess. > > A mess is a little harsh. Let's say it reminded me of earlier > conferences where some stuff fell through the cracks. I

Re: Survey: GUADEC and Akadamy co-location in 2011

2010-02-03 Thread john palmieri
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Dave Neary wrote: > Hi, > > > The Tampere bid manifested their interest in carrying their 09 bid over > for 10 - and the KDE board thought that was a good option. Given the > alternative timeframe (which we're currently experiencing), they said > "Good enough -

GNOME Q4 2009 Quarterly report

2010-02-03 Thread Stormy Peters
The GNOME Foundation would like to present the Q4 2009 Quarterly report[1] (HTML version[2]). Q4 is normally a quiet quarter — but not for GNOME! During Q4 we had our annual

Re: GNOME Q4 2009 Quarterly report

2010-02-03 Thread Stormy Peters
Corrected links: [1] http://foundation.gnome.org/reports/gnome-report-2009-Q4.pdf [2] http://foundation.gnome.org/reports/gnome-report-2009-Q4.html On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at

Re: [adboard] GNOME Q4 2009 Quarterly report

2010-02-03 Thread Behdad Esfahbod
The correct links: http://foundation.gnome.org/reports/gnome-report-2009-Q4.pdf http://foundation.gnome.org/reports/gnome-report-2009-Q4.html behdad On 02/03/2010 01:27 PM, Stormy Peters wrote: > Corrected links: > [1] http://foundation.gnome.org/reports/gnome-report-2009-Q4.pdf >

Re: GNOME Q4 2009 Quarterly report

2010-02-03 Thread Diego Escalante Urrelo
Hi! Just wanted to say three things: 1. Thank you to everyone that has contributed to GNOME in Q4, as hackers, testers, evangelists, friends of gnome! You make it possible, thanks! 2. Thanks to the teams for providing this really good feedback 3. I seem unable to open links in the PDF file.

Re: GNOME Q4 2009 Quarterly report

2010-02-03 Thread Vinicius Depizzol
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 23:41, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote: > > >  3. I seem unable to open links in the PDF file. Is it me, my evince, or > the file itself? Anyone has a clue? > > Great work, thanks again! :-) Hey Diego! Well, it is not you nor your evince :). The current way we do the PDF is