On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, David Neary wrote:
Let's say that it was a mistake, or that distributing the foot under the
GPL is incompatible with defending it as a trademark - what remedy do
you think we should consider?
Seems like that's what redhat does these days: releasing their
product which is
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Elijah Newren wrote:
On 9/9/05, Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, David Neary wrote:
Let's say that it was a mistake, or that distributing the foot under the
GPL is incompatible with defending it as a trademark - what remedy do
you
Just a quick note that I plan to send out candidacy mail later
this weekend.
Cheers,
--behdad
http://behdad.org/
Commandment Three says Do Not Kill, Amendment Two says Blood Will Spill
-- Dan Bern, New American Language
___
foundation-list
community as well. I have been
evangelizing the GNU and GNOME projects since 2000.
I'm from Iran, moved to Canada in 2003.
--Behdad Esfahbod
November 14, 2005
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Alan Horkan wrote:
Given this is a technical audience I'm sure you all understand the logic
of how the voting system works but I remind you to consider carefully
the value of your votes.
Maybe it's time to switch to STV [1]. I will bring that up when
next board is in
1. How much time can you dedicate to the board each week?
I can spend a total of 5 hours easily.
4. Explain how you expect to meet you goals.
If we manage to make the board more open, which seems to be
agreed as a most by almost all candidates, then I don't see the
baord work much
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
First question:
How important are desktop standards for you. How will you attempt to let
the GNOME developers cooperate even more with the freedesktop.org
movement? Or do you dislike that movement? In in general: What should
GNOME do with fd.org?
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005, Alan Horkan wrote:
Does ISV stand for Independent Software Vendor? If so, the term is
often misleading, because the most important developers of GNOME
applications--those developing free software--are mostly not vendors.
The important point is the need for clear
GNOME to Sponsor Female Developers in a Summer Outreach Program
BOSTON, Mass - June 13, 2006 - The GNOME Foundation is offering USD$9000
to female students in order to promote the participation of women in
GNOME-related development.
The money originates from GNOME's participation in the Google
I have some concerns about how per-module repos are going to work:
1) How/when can we group modules into one repo? For example, it might
make sense to group glib, pango, and gtk+ into one repo. But that makes
it harder to remember/guess the repo paths.
2) Even if we dictate one repo per
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 21:20 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 16:44 +, Alvaro del Castillo wrote:
Right now I am working in the University Rey Juan Carlos and we are
working hard researching how free software is developed.
By the way, I can vouch for the
Name: Behdad Esfahbod
Email: behdad gnome org
Affiliation: Red Hat, Inc.
Summary:
I run for the GNOME Foundation Board of Directors, because I care about
GNOME and I think the Board is very important. I contribute to GNOME on
a daily basis, and the board is yet another area of the project I
On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 16:39 -0500, Andy Tai wrote:
On 11/16/06, Joachim Noreiko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Name: Joachim Noreiko
As a board member, I want to work to lower the
barriers to entry that block potential GNOME
contributors. I hope that my
On Sun, 2006-11-26 at 17:30 -0500, Gabriel Burt wrote:
On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 21:40 -0500, Ryan Lortie wrote:
As a voter, how do I know that my token isn't just a deterministic
hash of my choices? The people running the election could then easily
just publish my choices along with this
On Sun, 2006-11-26 at 20:18 -0600, Gabriel Burt wrote:
On 11/26/06, Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What he's saying is that, suppose you voted for me, Quim, Federico,
Dave, Bastien, Luis, and Jeff, and were given the anonymous token
0bhnyOzwLJ05jYV2phjusfe0jBYO3HZf. How do you
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 12:53 +0530, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:
[1] What are your plans to answer the question put forward at the last
GUADEC about Why should one become a member of the GNOME Foundation ?
I think the current offerings: being able to vote for elections and to
get a @gnome.org
On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 09:23 -0300, Germán Poó Caamaño wrote:
No. It's not easy really. Just because the number of voters matches
the number of anon tokens listed, doesn't mean that unique tokens were
handed out to voters. The results can be perturbed by handing out the
same token to
On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 21:55 +0100, Quim Gil wrote:
- Let's schedule the AGM the afternoon or even early evening before
the Core days start.
Like it. We can even use the meeting to do some stuff like matching
faces to IRC nicks. I know I will miss catching up with at least a
couple of people
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 09:19 +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
So for the foundation board, there are two things that can be done
to improve the current situation:
1) Please present the issue at hand (this email and the email linked
to above) to the advisory board members, to make sure the
On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 10:37 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
Does that mean that candidates outside the EU would be considered? Not
sure - we would need to discuss it.
But one thing is for sure - the travel costs for attendees is
something
which will definitely be taken into account, and in
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 13:35 -0500, Jonathon Jongsma wrote:
On 4/13/07, Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 13:42 -0400, Dan Winship wrote:
Seriously though, this surprise announcement stuff is exactly the sort
of behavior that the community despises when
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 14:34 -0500, Jonathon Jongsma wrote:
And again, let me stress that this has nothing to do with whether I
trust any specific board members or whether I think the board is doing
a good job. I just think that maintaining an open culture where
everybody feels that they can
On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 11:47 +0200, Adrian Custer wrote:
Now I can't evaluate the *actual* work of the board by the very nature
of the secrecy; my only recourse is to trust you to auto-evaluate your
situation yourselves. I hope you can do that and then re-iterate that
you think it's best or
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 00:01 -0600, Miguel Angel López Hernández wrote:
El jue, 22-03-2007 a las 12:11 +, Alan Cox escribió:
Mexico has some claim to be the original home of Gnome...
In fact! we want to organize the GUADLAC (GNOME Users And Developers
Latin American Conference) the
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 22:39 +0300, Quim Gil wrote:
About the KDE GNOME event, probably the best way to progress is by
doing progressive approaches. Jumping from the current situation to a
joint conference sounds a bit like going from self-esteem to the 32nd
position of the Kama Sutra in one
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 12:43 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 22:39 +0300, Quim Gil wrote:
About the KDE GNOME event, probably the best way to progress is by
doing progressive approaches. Jumping from the current situation to a
joint conference sounds a bit like going from
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 19:02 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
This combined conference topic was brought up at DAM-4 last week in
the Desktop Organization Panel session with jrb and I in the panel
from GNOME and Lars and George (don't remember the last names) from
Lars Knoll.
KDE. When both
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 15:02 -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote:
On 6/29/07, Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 13:56 -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote:
Hello everyone,
(sorry if someone gets duplicates of this)
Fighting the consulates, I realized
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 20:09 +0100, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
Miguel and Michael have done remarkable jobs in many situations, and
as such deserve a lot of praise for those jobs.
This one, however, is not a remarkable job and deserves critic.
It's not about praise or doing a remarkable
Hi,
I want to suggest opting in for Code of Conduct [1] on foundation-list.
See the Applies to section of CoC for what this means in practical
terms.
[1] http://live.gnome.org/CodeOfConduct
Cheers,
--
behdad
http://behdad.org/
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 22:52 +0300, Quim Gil wrote:
In this context, and in the foundation related lists, an additional
code of conduct is just redundant.
Understood. But it's just easier to point people to CoC when they
behave poorly.
--
behdad
http://behdad.org/
Those who would give up
On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 18:56 +0300, Zeeshan Ali wrote:
Hello people!
I paid $50 yesterday morning to become a 'Benefactor' but so far i
haven't received any email from the gnome foundation about it. Are you
all on vacation at the same time? :)
Hi Zeeshan,
Thanks for your contribution.
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 12:49 +0100, Thomas Wood wrote:
On Fri, 3 Aug 2007 07:06:39 -0400
Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
A couple of developers, including myself, have been working on a
new capplet for the control center. Since we had been working on
it as a group we
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 21:48 +0200, Juan José Sánchez Penas wrote:
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 01:40:39PM -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
ownership. When multiple companies (Red Hat, Novell, Sun, ...) own
copyright on a package, it's harder to do something wrong (for example,
to relicense
On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 02:33 -0700, Andy Tai wrote:
OK, simply, the stated reason for the extraordinary measure (face to
face meeting timing) is not a strong one to justify touching the term
limit of the board.
And why do you think so? I totally understand that you may be against
extending the
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 18:51 +0300, Zeeshan Ali wrote:
Hello Behdad!
On 8/1/07, Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your contribution. Friends-of-GNOME payments are all
processed by our part-time administrator. Please give her a few days.
How exactly part-time
Hi Damien,
The problems you raise are real, and not unknown to the community and
the foundation board at all. However, I'm not sure who you have in mind
when you say am more and more disappointed by the way some people
*control* that community, even if they never contributed anything back
to
On Sun, 2007-09-09 at 18:49 +0200, Christian Rose wrote:
Nothing is ever solved by letting others be
responsible for solving problems that may have been introduced by you.
Or vice versa. That's a basic fact in SCM.
But more often than not the build is left broken by a translator.
--
behdad
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 09:52 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
I think it's a mistake not to have someone in Boston involved early in
the planning process. I asked someone last month if they'd be willing to
be involved, and they said yes. Has the board been in contact with them?
Hi Dave,
We most
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 10:30 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 10:30 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
planet-web already exists, but making it a free-for-all isn't a useful
solution.
I re-read http://perkypants.org/blog/2005/06/10/1118362980/ and it
mentions the
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 14:50 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 14:05 -0400, Claudio Saavedra wrote:
Put another way, I would find it uncomfortable to say someone sorry,
you don't belong here, so these situations should be avoided.
I think that adding a
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 12:21 -0400, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
Well, gnome is people that have a choice to contribute or not - making
those people (i.e. you me and everyone else) feel accepted and important
is central to having a healthy project where everyone wants to be
involved.
But if
On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 23:23 +0300, Žygimantas Beručka wrote:
Pr, 2007 10 15 22:54 +0300, Baris Cicek rašė:
The results are:
yes (125 votes)
no (22 votes)
Even though I've voted yes, the voting activity level is depressing I
must say.
Note that not everyone may have
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 23:06 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
On 6/10/07, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/10/07, Jody Goldberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 08:18:54PM -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
On 6/10/07, Glynn Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) ECMA
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 23:46 -0400, Corey Burger wrote:
On 10/29/07, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quote who=Luis Villa
So, uh... this apparently didn't happen, and now we're getting flamed
(rightfully) for appearing to give a stamp of approval to a deeply flawed
standard. So...
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 08:30 +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
Nonsese, says you. I had direct access to Microsoft representatives as
well, and even a Microsoft expert. Microsoft decided to spend their
money and time for two and half weeks calling me a liar, on blogs and
even on a
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 10:19 +0100, BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
I think that The GNOME participating in OOXML lends it a credibility
it does not deserve. Joining ECMA TC45 would be like joining of the
political party you dislike the most to improve their politics.
To me, it's more like going to
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 23:26 +0200, Quim Gil wrote:
On 11/6/07, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess it's no surprise that money and free/open software have a
delicate relationship...
I have been putting it in this way:
The connection between free software
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 15:42 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
I'm working with a French professor doing a computer science course and
using GNOME as a basis for the projects. Also, David Bolter put me in
contact with a professor who's interested in having students do some
GNOME-related projects.
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 08:02 -0200, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
Interesting way of putting it, we wouldnt ever want patches to be rushed
in because of cash incentives, this is indeed risky - on the other hand I dont
see why there shouldnt be some external distributed firm of developers
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 10:29 -0500, Liam R E Quin wrote:
Gnome Miles. :)
Already there. Called Bugzilla points :).
--
behdad
http://behdad.org/
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little
Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
-- Benjamin
On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 22:16 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
Please do stick to the regular routine. But I guess it's too late for
that now.
May I suggest that all further questions be sent to the election
committee (no CC to foundation-list!) for a second round?
--
behdad
http://behdad.org/
On Fri, 2007-11-23 at 02:10 -0300, Germán Poó-Caamaño wrote:
This is new to me. I thought this was the way the board was trying to
delegate.
Well, more recently it has been. But for most things that are brought
up to board, it's either not possible or not feasible to ask for help
publicly.
On Sun, 2007-11-25 at 18:50 -0600, George Kraft wrote:
We should then back that up by only providing
a oneway OOXML to ODF converter.
Doesn't that lock our users in? Isn't that bad by principle? Or is it
just bad when our competitors do it?
--
behdad
http://behdad.org/
Those who would
On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 10:28 -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
1. Would you change anything in the GNOME Foundation statement about
OOXML?
No. (send it out sooner is not a valid answer.)
2. How do you think the GNOME Foundation should support the Free
Software Movement in general?
By
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 20:30 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
I think the foundation could setup (orchestrate) meetings (or interops
or however you want to call them) with the different teams. Gather the
right people and put them together from time to times.
The foundation tries to do that, and
On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 17:32 -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
The reason this is not so is that Microsoft is trying to spin the
apparent support of GNOME into proof that OOXML is not bad for
free software.
Such a risk is always there. People who base their information on what
one side of a
Quick reply to say that I pretty much agree with Joe. There are areas
that it's very clear to anyone that our code infringing MS patents. And
none of that is hidden to anyone. Lemme give a very central and
specific example:
- GNOME requires at least one of Microsoft Uniscribe, Apple ATSUI,
On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 18:03 -0500, Joe Shaw wrote:
Again, I think this is a strawman argument. There's no evidence to
suggest that Microsoft would attack Mono any more than they would
attack other free and open source software like GNOME, the Linux
kernel, OpenOffice, Samba, Apache, Python,
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 18:42 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
Hi,
As warned about earlier in this election (by someone with better
foresight than I have), when there isn't an organized call for
questions people will fire off zillions of them at random. This puts
an unreasonable burden on not
On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 14:53 +0100, Kjartan Maraas wrote:
Just a note... I can probably find some good space at the University of
Toronto (Canada) if it was ever required. It is generally easier for
folks in some countries (like China, and Russia) to get visas to come
here, and it is a
On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 10:47 +0530, Ani Peter wrote:
Hi All,
I have heard a lot of people pronouncing GNOME as Ga-nome and I feel
Nome is the correct pronunciation.
Appreciate if someone please advise me which is the correct pronunciation.
Ga-nome is the correct pronunciation, not Nome.
On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 08:41 +, Telsa Gwynne wrote:
Ar Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 09:10:23PM -0700, ysgrifennodd Elijah Newren:
At the risk of sounding like a bad person...
[...]
Trying to counteract this factor, I've often voted for such people
that I thought would be great and would be
GNOME Foundation Announces Program to Sponsor Accessibility Projects
BOSTON, Mass—February 27, 2008 — The GNOME Foundation is running an
accessibility outreach program, offering USD$50,000 to be split among
individuals. This
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 11:08 -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
This activity sounds very useful, but there's a problem in the
announcement: it doesn't mention free software, but does mention
open source.
Hi Richard,
The only places in the announcement that open source appears is in the
Google's
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 20:19 +0530, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:
Have been meaning to do this for a while. This is just a word of thanks
to the Foundation Board for approving a tidy amount that came handy for
swag in India. Right through foss.in to a smaller set of events in
February
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 11:15 -0400, Jorge O. Castro wrote:
Hi everyone,
Hi Jorge,
Quick trip report from the GNOME Booth @ Lugradio Live USA.
First let me thank you for writing this report. Next, for writing it so
fast.
* Participants: Jorge Castro, Behdad Esfahbod, Roozbeh Pournader
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 12:08 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
Jeff Waugh wrote:
[ Dave points out that the offending Reply-To was of course on the announce
list email. While entirely intentional, and more effective than setting the
Mail-Followup-To header, it certainly engages the no-opt-out
coming to these
conferences do so primarily to meet up with old friends and have fun,
and so the hallway track and social activities are very important.
Behdad Esfahbod
Director, GNOME Foundation
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 03:41 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=Thomas Thurman
Is the rule about having GUADEC in Europe rather than, say, in
Bangalore
still in play, by the way?
The 'E' still stands for Europe, yeah. ;-)
Except that we have been advertising it as GUADEC, The GNOME
The boards of KDE e.V. and the GNOME Foundation have issued a call to
co-host Akademy and GUADEC, the flagship conferences of the KDE and
GNOME projects respectively, during the Summer of 2009.
This would be the first time that the conferences are to be co-hosted.
The combined conference is
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 12:42 -0300, Jonh Wendell wrote:
Hi, folks.
FISL - the biggest FLOSS event in Brazil - is over.
Thank you bunches John for representing GNOME at the event, blogging
regularly about it, and sending this update!
Cheers,
behdad
Thanks to Foundation, GNOME was
On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 04:38 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
Americans might feel that it is a little unfair that guadec always
is in
Europe. Couldn't there be two conferences?
GUADEC and the Boston Summit. :-)
Except that we don't pay for travel to Boston Summit.
We are launching GNOME.Asia
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 14:43 -0400, Hubert Figuiere wrote:
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 14:03 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
Except that we have been advertising it as GUADEC, The GNOME
Conference for the past couple of years. Maybe we should make that
official.
About GUADEC out of Europe
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 19:03 +, BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
About GUADEC out of Europe, that's fine as long as the place is Ok for
travel. Bangalore has the same problem that US has. Too far... That
said, I love
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 14:38 -0400, Adam Schreiber wrote:
I too would appreciate another North/Central/South America based
conference if GUADEC can't be moved across the pond occasionally.
However, I suspect that because the GNOME summit is held in Boston
every year we will have to make due.
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 15:43 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 20:34 +0200, BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
Usa isn't the only country in North America. Maybe Canada or Mexico
has less strict rules about visas? It is not hard to imagine that the
Americans might feel that it is a
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 22:57 -0400, Richard Stallman wrote:
GNOME is People. Do you have any evidence that the Moroccan *people*
are opposed to the values GNOME stands for?
I think the Moroccan *people* are not the issue.
Those people have an oppressing
regime, ignore them
not deserve.
Not sure who you mean when you say we. I don't agree with your last
sentence, no.
2008/4/22, Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 19:03 +, BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
About GUADEC out
it ?
Maybe should you rethink your We are the good guys, they are the ugly
guys kind of mentality ?
Respectfully,
--
Ali
2008/4/22, Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 19:03 +, BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL
On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 19:00 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
Rodrigo Moya wrote:
I wouldn't mind having a joint skiing/hacking conference there :-)
Crazy idea (tell me if I've been smoking the wacky baccy):
Someone offers to host the Summit at the Summit, say in Utah or
Whistler? Travel
On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 08:48 +1000, Andrew Cowie wrote:
If keeping the costs down is a factor, then perhaps some attempt
should
be made to return the conference forward in the calendar a bit. Too
late for 2008, of course, but something we may want to consider for
2009.
GUADEC was pushed
Some good jokes in this thread this morning :).
On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 13:33 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
Seriously, I went once to a ski resort, and some doctors conference was
taking place in a hotel there, and I really think it would be a great
thing for hackfests (maybe not for a big
[Resending to foundation-list, for those not subscribed to
foundation-announce. Fun, isn't it?]
Greetings,
A couple quick announcements. First:
To better manage organizational aspects of the board, the following
roles will by observed by board members:
- Chairman: Behdad Esfahbod
- Vice
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 00:50 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
Nonetheless I'm a big fan of Finland (Saunas, forests, Nokia). My
personal preference therefore goes to Tampere.
My second choice is Coruña in Galicia. The nice guys at Igalia have been
telling me a lot about Galicia ... I just
Hi everyone,
Quick reminder that we are all ears to hear your comments about the
three proposals. Please send them sooner rather than later.
Thanks
behdad
On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 18:17 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
Greetings,
The GNOME Foundation and KDE e.V. boards received three
On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 13:52 -0400, Liam R E Quin wrote:
On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 20:30 +0300, Petri Räsänen wrote:
[...]
As a final remark I believe that one factor in the decision making
process will be the message that will be read between the lines of
the decision. I can speak only
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 16:54 +0300, Luis Villa wrote:
It is my pleasure to announce that the Board has decided to hire
Stormy Peters as Executive Director of the Foundation.
Welcome Stormy indeed!
In case it's not clear, this hiring was the subject of the several
board-confidential meetings
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 19:59 -0500, Miguel Angel López Hernández wrote:
It is my pleasure to inform you all that first GUADLAC (GNOME Users And
Developers Latin American Conference) will be held in Veracruz, MX in
the 1st quarter of 2009 (almost sure in march), therefore respectfully
request
On Sun, 2008-07-13 at 12:41 +0200, Andy Wingo wrote:
Hey hackers,
Hi everyone.
Yay, we're going to the Canaries next year! That's great!
Yep. A formal press release is on the way.
The purpose of this message though is to express disagreement with the
way that the announcement was done (at
Many GNOME-friendly companies have job openings that they announce
on blogs, IRC, or random mailing list.
Many GNOME hackers look for jobs and they crawl blogs, mailing lists,
or ask on IRC.
Now there is a central place that community members can post GNOME-related
job openings, and job seekers
Calum Benson wrote:
On 15 Oct 2008, at 20:31, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
Many GNOME-friendly companies have job openings that they announce
on blogs, IRC, or random mailing list.
Many GNOME hackers look for jobs and they crawl blogs, mailing lists,
or ask on IRC.
Now there is a central
Dave Neary wrote:
Hello Julien,
Did you ever get a reply to this?
Julien Moutte wrote:
They are made available to do some buildbots for some projects (elisa,
flumotion) but the Gnome buildbot they were intended to run is not
really operational from my understanding.
I was under the
The inaugural Desktop Summit, uniting the flagship conferences of the GNOME
and KDE communities, GUADEC and Akademy, will be held in Gran Canaria, Canary
Islands, Spain the week of July 3-11, 2009.
The conference will be hosted by Cabildo, the local government of Gran Canaria.
The GNOME and KDE
The GNOME Foundation Board regretfully announces that Jeff Waugh will
be stepping down from the board in order to focus on work and other
projects. The board thanks Jeff for his years of service to the board
and the community, and wishes him success in his future work both
inside and outside of
Hi Gregory,
As I wasn't sure what the procedure was for the board of directors, in
the case of a resignation, I went and grabbed a copy of the bylaws
from http://foundation.gnome.org/about/bylaws.pdf Section 4
subsection d it states that the board can fill a vacancy by a vote of
the
In December I ran a distributed version control system survey for GNOME.
From the survey opening page:
Thank you for taking the GNOME DVCS Survey. This survey is run on behalf
of the GNOME Foundation board of directors, release team, and sysadmin team.
The GNOME project is planning a
On 03/30/2009 02:18 PM, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
Hi there,
In Behdad's mail on gtk-devel-list, Behdad explains on why the
foundation has decided to cut back on hackfests. This is a fair and
reasonable reason, by the way (his last mail in the thread explains the
financial aspect of it pretty
On 04/28/2009 07:20 PM, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
Vincent Untz wrote:
Hey Shaun,
Le mardi 28 avril 2009, à 16:13 -0500, Shaun McCance a écrit :
Owen sent an email to the list a short while back about a
FoG fundraising drive for a sysadmin:
On 05/01/2009 02:07 PM, Gian Mario Tagliaretti wrote:
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Diego Escalante Urrelodie...@gnome.org wrote:
best of sri rupert quotes t-shirt
I would buy 10.
plus another 10 here :)
Can you move this thread to #gnome-hackers please :).
behdad
PS. I'd also
1 - 100 of 178 matches
Mail list logo
