Re: GNOME Foundation Statement on ECMA TC45-M Participation

2007-11-25 Thread jamie
On Sun, 2007-11-25 at 12:18 -0500, Jody Goldberg wrote: On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 12:56:09PM +, jamie wrote: MOOX is most likely to become irrelevant IMO Not agreed. its debatable and subjective - yes. I reject the notion its a foregone conclusion that MS gets its way however

Re: GNOME Foundation Statement on ECMA TC45-M Participation

2007-11-25 Thread jamie
On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 04:45 +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote: quote who=jamie In any event I dont understand why the gnome foundation was pulled into this - cant you do your work with ECMA without foundation backing? As explained in the statement, the GNOME Foundation joined ECMA as a non-profit

Re: GNOME dependent on Mono

2007-11-30 Thread jamie
will be 1.1 which will have the above plug-in functionality defined As always, lack of time is making progress on Xesam slow atm but its getting there jamie ___ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: What do you think of the foundation?

2009-06-03 Thread Jamie McCracken
or aloof at times and they may also appear hostile to others but it rarely is a problem really - its part and parcel of any community Gnome is generally a happy place IMO and I dont think the board needs to act in this area yet jamie On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 10:45 -0600, Stormy Peters wrote: So