s are better off with a
> clearer spec.
Would it hurt so much to have a moratorium on MOOX dealings til after
February next year when ISO standard is determined?
Personally I would not want Gnome to touch it with a bargepole but I
dont have a problem with spec improvement *after* February next year.
I can see MS spinning this to their advantage and I believe playing safe
here would be better for us in the short term
jamie
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
On Sun, 2007-11-25 at 12:18 -0500, Jody Goldberg wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 12:56:09PM +0000, jamie wrote:
> >
> > MOOX is most likely to become irrelevant IMO
> Not agreed.
its debatable and subjective - yes. I reject the notion its a foregone
conclusion that MS ge
CMA as a
> non-profit to allow Jody to continue his work sucking the documentation
> blood from Microsoft's stone.
>
I know but that does not answer my question - could jody do this without
foundation backing?
if not then fair enough
jamie
__
On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 09:49 -0500, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
> On Nov 25, 2007 12:39 PM, jamie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-11-25 at 12:18 -0500, Jody Goldberg wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 12:56:09PM +, jamie wrote:
>
> > > > Offi
l. If it ever becomes mandatory, Gnome would probably fork and
its as simple as that. The official GNOME approved desktop and platform
is really the lowest common denominator for all its members - at least
that is how I understand how they approve stuff for it.
BoycottNovell are really "trolls r us&q
its competitors (as Ms tech is more likely to be tainted
with patents obviously)
If novell want mono to be on the agenda then they really have to can
their patent deal - I personally would object to any new mono apps
proposed for Gnome because of it on the grounds I stated above
jamie
__
xmas) the next thing will
be 1.1 which will have the above plug-in functionality defined
As always, lack of time is making progress on Xesam slow atm but its
getting there
jamie
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gn
ing myself will want
to attend
I would prefer it if it was Desktop search and *Metadata* as the search
aspect is already well covered in Xesam but the use of a centralised
metadata is critical to having a well integrated desktop.
jamie
___
foundatio
or aloof at times and they
may also appear hostile to others but it rarely is a problem really -
its part and parcel of any community
Gnome is generally a happy place IMO and I dont think the board needs to
act in this area yet
jamie
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 10:45 -0600, Stormy Peters wrote:
>
