Le mercredi 25 mai 2011 à 14:34 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
> On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 15:19 +0200, Lionel Dricot wrote:
[snip]
> Could you explain what concrete plans you have? Are you thinking that
> the GNOME Foundation should take care of distributing bids from
> customers to its ecosystem?
Le lundi 23 mai 2011 à 08:45 -0500, Paul Cutler a écrit :
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Martyn Russell wrote:
[snip]
> > Given the board represent the foundation at the highest level, why shouldn't
> > they be (more?) involved in commercialisation of GNOME?
>
> Just a quick note, but I belie
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 15:19 +0200, Lionel Dricot wrote:
> Hi Bastien et al,
>
> I'm sorry for the late reply but I wanted to take the time to clarify my
> vision.
> But improving the situation is not only about adding a webpage. It's
> really about adding a new paradigm to the GNOME foundation. T
Hi Bastien et al,
I'm sorry for the late reply but I wanted to take the time to clarify my
vision.
Having an honest experience in the proprietary software world, I
observed that having "official support" was a requirement for any
technological choices.
As such, choosing a product from a given co
Hi,
Le lundi 23 mai 2011, à 15:55 +0100, Martyn Russell a écrit :
> On 23/05/11 15:08, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> >Martyn Russell a écrit:
> >
> >>
> >>That's always needed too of course, but when you have potential
> >>customers asking who can provide support for projects X, Y and Z, do
> >>you rea
On 23/05/11 15:08, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
Martyn Russell a écrit:
That's always needed too of course, but when you have potential
customers asking who can provide support for projects X, Y and Z, do
you really want to be in a position where you have no answer?
Oh, you mean when a potential c
On 23/05/11 15:28, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
Martyn Russell a écrit:
On 23/05/11 12:02, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 09:29 +0200, Lionel Dricot wrote:
It is not only about having a page that list the
commercial support companies. It's more about a deep collaboration
between the
Martyn Russell a écrit:
> On 23/05/11 12:02, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>> On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 09:29 +0200, Lionel Dricot wrote:
>>> It is not only about having a page that list the
>>> commercial support companies. It's more about a deep collaboration
>>> between the foundation and the companies
Martyn Russell a écrit:
>
> That's always needed too of course, but when you have potential
> customers asking who can provide support for projects X, Y and Z, do
> you really want to be in a position where you have no answer?
Oh, you mean when a potential customer comes to the /Foundation Board
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Martyn Russell wrote:
> Isn't that part of the problem? If the foundation isn't behind this, won't
> it seem completely self indulgent on behalf of businesses alone?
>
> What I personally would like to see is much more backing from the
> foundation. E.g.
>
> - A w
On 23/05/11 13:43, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
Lionel Dricot a écrit:
At Lanedo, we have been surprised a few times by people who were
thinking that there was no commercial support available for GTK+. We
have heard of companies switching to Qt because Qt was guaranteed by a
company.
Things like tha
On 23/05/11 12:02, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 09:29 +0200, Lionel Dricot wrote:
It is not only about having a page that list the
commercial support companies. It's more about a deep collaboration
between the foundation and the companies that live from GNOME.
I personally don
Lionel Dricot a écrit:
> At Lanedo, we have been surprised a few times by people who were
> thinking that there was no commercial support available for GTK+. We
> have heard of companies switching to Qt because Qt was guaranteed by a
> company.
>
> Things like that clearly show a lack of communic
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 09:29 +0200, Lionel Dricot wrote:
> Le lundi 23 mai 2011 à 00:14 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
> > Le dimanche 22 mai 2011, à 23:45 +0200, Lionel Dricot a écrit :
> > > It would have been easy to criticize, to say loudly that the board
> > > should improve the situation withou
Le lundi 23 mai 2011 à 00:14 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
> Le dimanche 22 mai 2011, à 23:45 +0200, Lionel Dricot a écrit :
> > It would have been easy to criticize, to say loudly that the board
> > should improve the situation without moving a single finger. But I think
> > that, if you want some
Le dimanche 22 mai 2011 à 23:44 -0400, Richard Stallman a écrit :
> At Lanedo, we have been surprised a few times by people who were
> thinking that there was no commercial support available for GTK+.
>
> It would make good sense for GNOME to have a list of commercial
> service providers. It
At Lanedo, we have been surprised a few times by people who were
thinking that there was no commercial support available for GTK+.
It would make good sense for GNOME to have a list of commercial
service providers. It should have stated rules of good conduct
and list anyone who agrees to t
Le lundi 23 mai 2011, à 00:14 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
> Le dimanche 22 mai 2011, à 23:45 +0200, Lionel Dricot a écrit :
> > It would have been easy to criticize, to say loudly that the board
> > should improve the situation without moving a single finger. But I think
> > that, if you want som
Le dimanche 22 mai 2011, à 23:45 +0200, Lionel Dricot a écrit :
> It would have been easy to criticize, to say loudly that the board
> should improve the situation without moving a single finger. But I think
> that, if you want something to happen, you have to make it yourself. I
> think that the G
Le dimanche 22 mai 2011 à 22:23 +0200, Olav Vitters a écrit :
> On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 11:00:45AM +0200, Lionel Dricot wrote:
> > I want to achieve to make obvious to anybody that all the GNOME
> > technologies (including GTK+) are technologies adapted to a commercial
> > product and that high qua
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 11:00:45AM +0200, Lionel Dricot wrote:
> I want to achieve to make obvious to anybody that all the GNOME
> technologies (including GTK+) are technologies adapted to a commercial
> product and that high quality commercial support exist for them. I hope
> this will help GNOME
21 matches
Mail list logo
