Hi,
Žygimantas Beručka wrote:
The results are:
yes (125 votes)
no (22 votes)
Even though I've voted yes, the voting activity level is depressing I
must say. How many members the Foundation has currently?
Voting in referenda is generally not very high, and there was 0 debate
quote who=Dave Neary
Voting in referenda is generally not very high, and there was 0 debate on
this issue on the list (I did see some grumbling on IRC, but nothing
concrete), so it's hardly an initiative that's going to mobilise the
troops.
There was buttloads of discussion around the
Hi,
Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=Dave Neary
Voting in referenda is generally not very high, and there was 0 debate on
this issue on the list (I did see some grumbling on IRC, but nothing
concrete), so it's hardly an initiative that's going to mobilise the
troops.
There was buttloads of
Is it really a too difficult and too time consuming task to spend a
minute to cast one's vote in a fortnight for an average GNOME Foundation
member?
I had no strong opinion so I left it up to the others.
___
foundation-list mailing list
Hi,
Pr, 2007 10 15 22:54 +0300, Baris Cicek rašė:
The results are:
yes (125 votes)
no (22 votes)
Even though I've voted yes, the voting activity level is depressing I
must say. How many members the Foundation has currently?
Is it really a too difficult and too time consuming
Le lundi 15 octobre 2007, à 23:23 +0300, Žygimantas Beručka a écrit :
Hi,
Pr, 2007 10 15 22:54 +0300, Baris Cicek rašė:
The results are:
yes (125 votes)
no (22 votes)
Even though I've voted yes, the voting activity level is depressing I
must say. How many members the
On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 23:23 +0300, Žygimantas Beručka wrote:
Pr, 2007 10 15 22:54 +0300, Baris Cicek rašė:
The results are:
yes (125 votes)
no (22 votes)
Even though I've voted yes, the voting activity level is depressing I
must say.
Note that not everyone may have
