Excellent! Will try it later today.
G.
Marco van de Voort wrote:
Is FreeBSD 6.0 for i386 platform supported?
I ran FPC on FreeBSD 6, and found no problems. Didn't expect them either,
6 is largely 5 backwards compat.
___
fpc-devel maillist -
X11/cursorfont.h header translation. Yes, it's one of the standard
headers of the official Xlib :)
{ $Xorg: cursorfont.h,v 1.4 2001/02/09 02:03:39 xorgcvs Exp $ }
{
Copyright 1987, 1998 The Open Group
Permission to use, copy, modify, distribute, and sell this software and its
documentation for
I read the very interesting article about the Systems fair:
http://www.freepascal.org/wiki/index.php/Systems_2005
One conclusion was that the web appearance needs to be improved:
..
The websites are a serious problem. They are quite ugly and not very
intuitive, and this is the case for
L505 wrote:
I think like how torry.net, Delphi 3000, etc. work (but you obviously can create
smaller websites than that) people should be building independent websites to
promote
freepascal.
I would diagree. Up to now there a tons of sites concering FPC/Lazarus:
freepascal.org,
I think the simplest and perhaps most important change to get better PR
for both Lazarus and FPC is the web page. It needs to be more wow
style. News have to be a bit propagandistic. A FAQ is IMHO required with
first questions like:
1. Is Free Pascal/Lazarus really free?
2. Can I use Free
Nikolay Nikolov wrote:
X11/cursorfont.h header translation. Yes, it's one of the standard
headers of the official Xlib :)
Thanks, added.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
Ales Katona wrote:
I think the simplest and perhaps most important change to get better
PR for both Lazarus and FPC is the web page. It needs to be more wow
style. News have to be a bit propagandistic. A FAQ is IMHO required
with first questions like:
1. Is Free Pascal/Lazarus really free?
1. Is Free Pascal/Lazarus really free?
2. Can I use Free Pascal/Lazarus for commercial development?
3. Are there any real world applications made with Free Pascal/Lazarus?
4. Why should I use Free Pascal/Lazarus?
5. Isn't Free Software equal to crappy software?
etc.
In other words,
Ales Katona wrote:
5. Isn't Free Software equal to crappy software?
You're right. About Proprietary Software, there is no need to ask the
question, the answer is obvious.
mm
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
some discussion points:
- one canonical site
- consistent style/color on all sites
- strip off old bones (TP tutorials, MOS)
- merge FPC and Lazarus sites
this is about the same we've discussed during Systems... :)
Michalis Kamburelis wrote:
Ales Katona wrote:
1. Is Free Pascal/Lazarus really free?
The freeness of FreePascal is already advertised in a lot of places,
including the very name FreePascal. Current FAQ mentions (more than
once) that the compiler is GPLed. I don't think there's any need
Ales Katona wrote:
Michalis Kamburelis wrote:
Ales Katona wrote:
[...]
2. Can I use Free Pascal/Lazarus for commercial development?
This is the 4th question of current FAQ. And I assume that you
actually wanted to say closed source, this is not the same thing as
commercial.
If
12 matches
Mail list logo
