On 1/20/06, Bisma Jayadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's not the advocacy that is needed but rather they need code for it
> > to work. It says right in the article.
>
> I think we should stop the VB vs Pascal discussion now. It's useless since we
> all here already know which is the winner. E
> It's not the advocacy that is needed but rather they need code for it
> to work. It says right in the article.
I think we should stop the VB vs Pascal discussion now. It's useless since we
all here already know which is the winner. Even Alex himself had already knew
about this, no need to con
What are VCL and KOL? What is the difference
between the two?
Sincerely,Alex C. BarberiChief Executive
OfficerVisionForcehttp://www.visionforceweb.com
- Original Message -
From:
L505
To: FPC developers' list
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 5:43
PM
Subject: Re
> If I wrote a program like Notepad in Delphi,
what would be the minimum installation
> requirements to get the program up
and running on a computer that just
had
> Windows freshly installed?
If you use regular Delphi and VCL it can be
anywwhere from 300-500K.
If you use Delphi wit
Wow! No framework or service pack installation! This is great!
Sincerely,
Alex C. Barberi
Chief Executive Officer
VisionForce
http://www.visionforceweb.com
-
[try two]
On 1/19/06, VisionForce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[try two]
On 1/19/06, VisionForce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I wrote a program like Notepad in Delphi, what would be the minimum
> installation requirements to get the program up and running on a computer
> that just had Windows freshly installed?
Windows 95+ (Including all series).
That´s
On 1/19/06, VisionForce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the info; I don't find that to be a big problem though. The
> reason it executes the control automatically is because a lot of custom
> controls have design features added to their Load function and you would
> want to see these visual
If I wrote a program like Notepad in Delphi, what
would be the minimum installation requirements to get the program up and
running on a computer that just had Windows freshly installed?
Sincerely,Alex C. BarberiChief Executive
OfficerVisionForcehttp://www.visionforceweb.com
__
Thanks for the info; I don't find that to be a big problem though. The
reason it executes the control automatically is because a lot of custom
controls have design features added to their Load function and you would
want to see these visual changes on your form.
Sincerely,
Alex C. Barberi
Chi
On 1/19/06, VisionForce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/19/06, VisionForce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You all may hate me after I say this, but creating software in VB or
> > VB.NET
> > goes very, very quickly. But I guess since you're trying to advocate
> > Pascal
> > right now, this informa
It's not the advocacy that is needed but rather they need code for it to work.
It
says right in the article.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
On 1/19/06, VisionForce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Exactly! And a very nice one at that! Look at MSDN.
Well, then, all help is appreciated ^^
thanks,
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://list
On 1/19/06, VisionForce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Exactly! And a very nice one at that! Look at MSDN.
Well, then, all help is appreciated ^^
thanks,
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists
- Original Message -
From: "Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FPC developers' list"
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 11:01 AM
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] Re: [fpc-deve] PR: Advocates needed
On 1/19/06, VisionForce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyway I could turn this
On 1/19/06, VisionForce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyway I could turn this newsgroup into something
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/newsgroups if you people wanted.
Are you proposing that you create a web-reading tool for this newsgroup?
If not ... they I did not understand this...
--
Felipe Mont
Yes, I never use VB6. But VB.NET is much more powerful, and programs can
be
created in it in half the time. I don't understand what you mean by "very
scary features."
VB is now obsolete and it´s code doesn´t work on VB.NET. What will you
do when Microsoft also drop VB.NET??
They really like to
> Yes, I never use VB6. But VB.NET is much more powerful, and programs can be
> created in it in half the time. I don't understand what you mean by "very
> scary features."
VB is now obsolete and it´s code doesn´t work on VB.NET. What will you
do when Microsoft also drop VB.NET??
They really like
Oh well, you people have beat me down. No more
VB.NET stuff (but uh, Daniel, you must be thinking of VB6; VB.NET is much
different).
Anyway I could turn this newsgroup into something
http://msdn.microsoft.com/newsgroups
if you people wanted.
Alex C. Barberi
On 1/19/06, VisionForce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You all may hate me after I say this, but creating software in VB or VB.NET
> goes very, very quickly. But I guess since you're trying to advocate Pascal
> right now, this information doesn't help you any.
The first programming language I learne
VisionForce wrote:
> Well that's interesting, I didn't know that. How is that so? I mean,
> what makes it less error prone?
The syntax and semantics of language can be designed in a way to avoid common
mistakes and reduce debugging time.
> Isn't it the programmer?
The language can help the pro
On 1/19/06, VisionForce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You all may hate me after I say this, but creating software in VB or
VB.NET
goes very, very quickly. But I guess since you're trying to advocate
Pascal
right now, this information doesn't help you any.
Yes it does, if you can provide the main
Op Thu, 19 Jan 2006, schreef VisionForce:
> Well that's interesting, I didn't know that. How is that so? I mean, what
> makes it less error prone? Isn't it the programmer?
An important issue is that you don't need tricks to accomplish things,
i.e. in VB as soon as you start to call handleevent
Op Thu, 19 Jan 2006, schreef Florian Klaempfl:
> VisionForce wrote:
> > You all may hate me after I say this, but creating software in VB or
> > VB.NET goes very, very quickly. But I guess since you're trying to
> > advocate Pascal right now, this information doesn't help you any.
>
> Well, my
On 1/19/06, VisionForce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You all may hate me after I say this, but creating software in VB or
VB.NET
goes very, very quickly. But I guess since you're trying to advocate
Pascal
right now, this information doesn't help you any.
The last time I used VB (version 6), it
Trying to compile this code
procedure SystemCall(n: integer); assembler; inline;
asm
MOVR0, R0, LSL #0x10
SWIR0
end;
I get this internal error 200501051 on the '#' character. Is it an error in
my code or it is a compiler related issue?
___
On 1/19/06, VisionForce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You all may hate me after I say this, but creating software in VB or VB.NET
> goes very, very quickly. But I guess since you're trying to advocate Pascal
> right now, this information doesn't help you any.
Yes it does, if you can provide the mai
On 1/19/06, VisionForce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You all may hate me after I say this, but creating software in VB or VB.NET
> goes very, very quickly. But I guess since you're trying to advocate Pascal
> right now, this information doesn't help you any.
The last time I used VB (version 6), it
Well that's interesting, I didn't know that. How is that so? I mean, what
makes it less error prone? Isn't it the programmer?
VisionForce wrote:
You all may hate me after I say this, but creating software in VB or
VB.NET goes very, very quickly. But I guess since you're trying to
advocate Pas
VisionForce wrote:
> You all may hate me after I say this, but creating software in VB or
> VB.NET goes very, very quickly. But I guess since you're trying to
> advocate Pascal right now, this information doesn't help you any.
Well, my personal experience is, that in total Delphi/Object Pascal is
On 1/19/06, Paul Davidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does Python have any IDE comparable with lazarus?
>
> Does Python run as fast as FPC?
We already know that!
You need to tell this to the TurboCash guys :-)
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
___
fpc-
You all may hate me after I say this, but creating software in VB or VB.NET
goes very, very quickly. But I guess since you're trying to advocate Pascal
right now, this information doesn't help you any.
Sincerely,
Alex C. Barberi
Chief Executive Officer
VisionForce
http://www.visionforceweb.com
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:06:57 +0100
Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please check if it appears on other news sites and please guard the sites
> > mentioned for "Pascal is a language for noobs"-like trolling.
>
> Does Python have any IDE comparable with lazarus?
Boa constructor II
On 1/19/06, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniël Mantione wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Check this...
> >
> > http://software.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=06/01/09/1647217
> >
> > ... huge accounting program. Formerly propietary, now GPL, that is in need
> > from porting from Delphi t
On Jan 19, 2006, at 11:06, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Daniël Mantione wrote:
Hello,
Check this...
http://software.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=06/01/09/1647217
... huge accounting program. Formerly propietary, now GPL, that is in
need
from porting from Delphi to Free Pascal to become true f
Daniël Mantione wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Check this...
>
> http://software.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=06/01/09/1647217
>
> ... huge accounting program. Formerly propietary, now GPL, that is in need
> from porting from Delphi to Free Pascal to become true free software.
>
> The only problem is, t
I took the flag and posted an article with a successfull linux port
with Lazarus on their Google Developers group:
http://groups.google.com.br/group/TurboCASH?lnk=li
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
Bisma Jayadi wrote:
> Hey! The writter of that article is clearly pro-Python!
By the way... currently I'm working on a dictionary application
(Indonesian-English and vice versa) using FPC/Lazarus, also a convertion
from Delphi. Can I put this project of mine on FPC site? On which
section?
Thank you, Daniël. As soon as I got an account on SourceForge for my project,
I'll contact FPC site webmaster. :)
Regards,
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at
http://beeography.blogsome.com
Daniël Mantione wrote:
I plan to continue work on the gallery soon, I think it would be nice to
have it there, o
TurboCASH FPC convertion project will be a good start to prove the power of
FPC/Lazarus. Though it requires highly skilled developers -since it's a big and
complex application-, some FPC experts has to take this chance. I believe lots
of FPC fans will contribute to this project. :)
Regards,
-
Op Thu, 19 Jan 2006, schreef Bisma Jayadi:
> By the way... currently I'm working on a dictionary application
> (Indonesian-English and vice versa) using FPC/Lazarus, also a convertion from
> Delphi. Can I put this project of mine on FPC site? On which section? Whom I
> should contact? Thanks.
I
On 19 jan 2006, at 13:36, VisionForce wrote:
On the other hand, they might hate it because they're afraid it's
going to take over their language.
I think it's mainly prejudice and ignorance. And many Pascal
advocates are guilty of exactly the same thing when it comes to other
languages..
The only reason those people think Pascal is bad is because it's been around
for so long; they don't realize that it's maturing.
On the other hand, they might hate it because they're afraid it's going to
take over their language.
Sincerely,
Alex C. Barberi
Chief Executive Officer
VisionForce
> Hey! The writter of that article is clearly pro-Python!
I wonder... why most developers still think negatively about (object) Pascal?
Don't they ever heard about Delphi (in propietary world) or the great FPC (in
FLOSS world)? NO matter how good Delphi or FPC is, they still talking about the
Daniël Mantione wrote:
Hello,
Check this...
http://software.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=06/01/09/1647217
... huge accounting program. Formerly propietary, now GPL, that is in need
from porting from Delphi to Free Pascal to become true free software.
The only problem is, they are not only c
Op Thu, 19 Jan 2006, schreef Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho:
> On 1/19/06, Daniël Mantione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://software.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=06/01/09/1647217
>
> Hey! The writter of that article is clearly pro-Python!
Yes...
> There is a lot
> of personal oppinion in th
On 1/19/06, Daniël Mantione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://software.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=06/01/09/1647217
Hey! The writter of that article is clearly pro-Python! There is a lot
of personal oppinion in that article. What kind of approach you were
thinking at to talk to the authors of t
Op Thu, 19 Jan 2006, schreef Micha Nelissen:
> Daniël Mantione wrote:
> > ... huge accounting program. Formerly propietary, now GPL, that is in
> > need from porting from Delphi to Free Pascal to become true free
> > software.
> >
> > The only problem is, they are not only considering Free Pasc
Daniël Mantione wrote:
... huge accounting program. Formerly propietary, now GPL, that is in need
from porting from Delphi to Free Pascal to become true free software.
The only problem is, they are not only considering Free Pascal,
but also Python.
What functionality are they using from the
Hello,
Check this...
http://software.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=06/01/09/1647217
... huge accounting program. Formerly propietary, now GPL, that is in need
from porting from Delphi to Free Pascal to become true free software.
The only problem is, they are not only considering Free Pascal,
b
Am Thursday 19 January 2006 09:24 schrieb Florian Klaempfl:
> Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote:
> > Am Wednesday 18 January 2006 12:06 schrieb Vinzent Hoefler:
> >>On Wednesday 18 January 2006 10:30, Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> >>>When I include cthreads and (manually?) initialize the ThreadM
Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote:
> Am Wednesday 18 January 2006 12:06 schrieb Vinzent Hoefler:
>
>>On Wednesday 18 January 2006 10:30, Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote:
>
> ...
>
>>>When I include cthreads and (manually?) initialize the ThreadManager,
>>>would it be ok ?
>>
>>I think you should "simply" write a
Am Wednesday 18 January 2006 12:06 schrieb Vinzent Hoefler:
> On Wednesday 18 January 2006 10:30, Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote:
...
> > When I include cthreads and (manually?) initialize the ThreadManager,
> > would it be ok ?
>
> I think you should "simply" write and install your own thread manager
> b
52 matches
Mail list logo
