Re: [fpc-devel] two changes to fcl 2.0.5

2007-01-11 Thread Daniël Mantione
Op Thu, 11 Jan 2007, schreef Jesus Reyes: > If you don't see a problem to do, why not simply do it? They are merged. > But, if nobody uses it, why it's being updated?, this simply doesn't > match. No active development is done, but at request we still do some merges. > I use 2.1.1 and 2.0.

Re: [fpc-devel] two changes to fcl 2.0.5

2007-01-11 Thread Jesus Reyes
--- Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > > > On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Jesus Reyes wrote: > > > > > --- Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Jesus Reyes wrote: > > > > > > > Hi. > > > > > > > > I'm finally tired of two bug

Re: [fpc-devel] two changes to fcl 2.0.5

2007-01-11 Thread Daniël Mantione
Op Thu, 11 Jan 2007, schreef Michael Van Canneyt: > Well, > > As far as I know, there are no releases or snapshots built of 2.0.5, > so why would we update that branch ? Oh come on, you should know this. Daily snapshots are being built for Dos, Win32, i386 Linux and x86_64 Linux. Consider t

Re: [fpc-devel] two changes to fcl 2.0.5

2007-01-11 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Jesus Reyes wrote: > > --- Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > > > > > > > On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Jesus Reyes wrote: > > > > > Hi. > > > > > > I'm finally tired of two bugs in fcl in 2.0.5, it could be > > possible > > > that these be made/merged back?. >

Re: [fpc-devel] two changes to fcl 2.0.5

2007-01-11 Thread Jesus Reyes
--- Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > > > On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Jesus Reyes wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > I'm finally tired of two bugs in fcl in 2.0.5, it could be > possible > > that these be made/merged back?. > > > > 1. TSQLQuery under 2.0.5 stores readonly published property

Re: [fpc-devel] two changes to fcl 2.0.5

2007-01-11 Thread Aleš Katona
> I don't see the use. We're preparing to release 2.2. > > In March we do a code freeze and start the release process. > > Michael. I think the use is something like january, february, march and possibly april. That's 4 months of bugs with no choice but 2.1.1 Rather ackward if you ask me. A

Re: [fpc-devel] two changes to fcl 2.0.5

2007-01-11 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Jesus Reyes wrote: > Hi. > > I'm finally tired of two bugs in fcl in 2.0.5, it could be possible > that these be made/merged back?. > > 1. TSQLQuery under 2.0.5 stores readonly published property IndexDefs > into lazarus lfm file. Lazarus is happy reading back the lfm file

[fpc-devel] two changes to fcl 2.0.5

2007-01-11 Thread Jesus Reyes
Hi. I'm finally tired of two bugs in fcl in 2.0.5, it could be possible that these be made/merged back?. 1. TSQLQuery under 2.0.5 stores readonly published property IndexDefs into lazarus lfm file. Lazarus is happy reading back the lfm file if it was compiled with 2.0.5 but if it was compiled wit

Re: [fpc-devel] outdated docs (maybe)

2007-01-11 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > By the way, is there a release date or estimate set for 2.2? Let's say that a preliminary beta is planned for March, but this date is very temptative, and subject to change, so don't hold your breath waiting for this :-) Just to say that we're no

Re: [fpc-devel] outdated docs (maybe)

2007-01-11 Thread Marco van de Voort
> Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is this documentation outdated? > > > > http://lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net/docs/rtl/classes/tthreadlist.html > > > > It states: "Thread-safe list object (not yet implemented)." > > ..but yet it looks implemented to me... > > > > > It seems like only a few

Re: [fpc-devel] outdated docs (maybe)

2007-01-11 Thread Michael Schnell
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: Hi, Is this documentation outdated? http://lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net/docs/rtl/classes/tthreadlist.html It states: "Thread-safe list object (not yet implemented)." ..but yet it looks implemented to me... It seems like only a few lines of code to make TThreadList fr

Re: [fpc-devel] outdated docs (maybe)

2007-01-11 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
By the way, is there a release date or estimate set for 2.2? G. On 1/11/07, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > Hi, > > Is this documentation outdated? > > http://lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net/docs/rtl/classes/tthreadlist.html > > It

Re: [fpc-devel] outdated docs (maybe)

2007-01-11 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
Thanks, just wanted to make sure I my assumption was correct. I'll create a patch for the docs shortly. G. On 1/11/07, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > Hi, > > Is this documentation outdated? > > http://lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.n

Re: [fpc-devel] outdated docs (maybe)

2007-01-11 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > Hi, > > Is this documentation outdated? > > http://lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net/docs/rtl/classes/tthreadlist.html > > It states: "Thread-safe list object (not yet implemented)." > ..but yet it looks implemented to me... It's due for updating. S