Neil Graham schrieb:
Daniël Mantione wrote:
Andreas uses a preprocessor to convert the language extensions into
Delphi compatible code. This is a remarkable achievement, but I don't
see much value for this approach for Free Pascal; since we have the
source code, we could implement the
On 13/06/07, Daniël Mantione [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas uses a preprocessor to convert the language extensions into Delphi
compatible code. This is a remarkable achievement, but I don't see much
value for this approach for Free Pascal; since we have the source code, we
could implement the
Op Thu, 14 Jun 2007, schreef Graeme Geldenhuys:
On 13/06/07, Daniël Mantione [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas uses a preprocessor to convert the language extensions into
Delphi
compatible code. This is a remarkable achievement, but I don't see much
value for this approach for Free
On Thursday 14 June 2007 06:42, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Why do you need a plug in mechanism? You've the sources? When you
have the sources, 90 per cent of the use of a plugin are gone.
Well, we'd call that non-intrusive change. ;)
You'd just need to compile the plug-in, and not a changed
Vinzent Hoefler schrieb:
On Thursday 14 June 2007 06:42, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Why do you need a plug in mechanism? You've the sources? When you
have the sources, 90 per cent of the use of a plugin are gone.
Well, we'd call that non-intrusive change. ;)
You'd just need to compile the
Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb:
Hi,
I found this website containing language extension that Andreas
Hausladen wrote for Delphi.
Is there possibly something we can use in Free Pascal? Sorry, I'm not
sure what license Andreas used.
http://andy.jgknet.de/dlang/
I like the idea of making
Actually, Delphi now supports for-in.
It also supports things like nested classes, class helpers, operator
overloading and inlining.
See:
http://dn.codegear.com/article/34324
On 14/06/07, Florian Klaempfl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb:
Hi,
I found this website
Op Thu, 14 Jun 2007, schreef Florian Klaempfl:
Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb:
Hi,
I found this website containing language extension that Andreas
Hausladen wrote for Delphi.
Is there possibly something we can use in Free Pascal? Sorry, I'm not
sure what license Andreas used.
David Butler wrote / napísal(a):
Actually, Delphi now supports for-in.
It also supports things like nested classes, class helpers, operator
overloading and inlining.
All those features are because of .NET.
FPC supported proper operator overloading (not in classes only) and
inlining for quite
On 14/06/07, Ales( Katona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Butler wrote / napísal(a):
Actually, Delphi now supports for-in.
It also supports things like nested classes, class helpers, operator
overloading and inlining.
All those features are because of .NET.
All the same, they are also
David Butler wrote / napísal(a):
All the same, they are also supported in the Win32 compiler.
What I ment to say is that we're most probably not going to re-do what
we already have done differently before Delphi. eg: I don't see their
OOP operator overloading as viable considering we have a
Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Thu, 14 Jun 2007, schreef Florian Klaempfl:
Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb:
I like the for-in code.
Using the default property is clean, using count imo not. Thought I
admit I've no idea so far to do it better.
Well, there already is a ;default; directive, we could
On 14/06/07, Bram Kuijvenhoven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Thu, 14 Jun 2007, schreef Florian Klaempfl:
Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb:
I like the for-in code.
Using the default property is clean, using count imo not. Thought I
admit I've no idea so far to do it better.
Ales schrieb:
David Butler wrote / napísal(a):
Actually, Delphi now supports for-in.
It also supports things like nested classes, class helpers, operator
overloading and inlining.
All those features are because of .NET.
FPC supported proper operator overloading (not in classes only) and
Delphi supports iterator for the for in in different ways:
* Dynamic arrays, static arrays, sets, strings and records have built-in
iterators
* For classes and interface it requires a method called GetEnumerator.
GetEnumerator can return a class, an interface or a record. This class,
15 matches
Mail list logo
