On Sat, 13 Sep 2008, ABorka wrote:
Hi Michael,
I see 12110 is applied now, super :)
I am trying to improve on the fcl-web and the next step would be to fix the
apache module related things. However, there is a problem I could use some
help with.
It seems that when the apache module
Hi,
this patch rewrites code of ArrayRTTI and fpc_Copy to allow the compiler
to generate faster code (at least on i386).
The change in ArrayRTTI yields a performance gain of ~4% for our real
world application on a 3 GHz Intel Xeon.
The change in fpc_Copy is completely untestet because I don't
On 14 Sep 2008, at 14:49, Markus Beth wrote:
this patch rewrites code of ArrayRTTI and fpc_Copy to allow the
compiler to generate faster code (at least on i386).
The change in ArrayRTTI yields a performance gain of ~4% for our
real world application on a 3 GHz Intel Xeon.
The change in
On 12 Sep 2008, at 22:28, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
I've run the test suite for the compiler with and without
optimisation, so far I don't see any revealing differences in the
output but I might be overlooking something significant due to
inexperience.
You can compare the generated
Op Sun, 14 Sep 2008, schreef Jonas Maebe:
On 14 Sep 2008, at 14:49, Markus Beth wrote:
this patch rewrites code of ArrayRTTI and fpc_Copy to allow the compiler to
generate faster code (at least on i386).
The change in ArrayRTTI yields a performance gain of ~4% for our real world
Daniël Mantione schrieb:
Op Sun, 14 Sep 2008, schreef Jonas Maebe:
On 14 Sep 2008, at 14:49, Markus Beth wrote:
this patch rewrites code of ArrayRTTI and fpc_Copy to allow the
compiler to generate faster code (at least on i386).
The change in ArrayRTTI yields a performance gain of ~4% for
Daniël Mantione schrieb:
Op Sun, 14 Sep 2008, schreef Florian Klaempfl:
Daniël Mantione schrieb:
Op Sun, 14 Sep 2008, schreef Jonas Maebe:
On 14 Sep 2008, at 14:49, Markus Beth wrote:
this patch rewrites code of ArrayRTTI and fpc_Copy to allow the
compiler to generate faster code (at
On 14 Sep 2008, at 15:11, Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Sun, 14 Sep 2008, schreef Jonas Maebe:
I don't think it's a good idea to start manually adding loop
induction variables to many routines in the rtl. It makes the code
less maintainable, and at one point the compilation process itself
Thanks for the detailed answer. I think the picture now is clear enough to
start working
Peter
On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 17:41:39 -0500, Jonas Maebe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 13 Sep 2008, at 21:49, Peter Popov wrote:
I read Felipe's wiki thouroughly and i think I can manage that part. I
Martin Schreiber schrieb:
On Thursday 11 September 2008 23.18:07 Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Martin Schreiber schrieb:
On Saturday 30 August 2008 13.37:42 Florian Klaempfl wrote:
I have a crash in MSEide startup in a procedure finalization section:
[...]
I saw that you merged unicodestring to
On Sunday 14 September 2008 19.22:13 Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Martin Schreiber schrieb:
I tried with trunk, same result. The problem is probably that the second
constant string parameter has a wrong reference count. It is initially 0
instead of -1. The incref call at begin of winfilepath
Hi Michael,
I assume you are not using Lazarus to create your descendents;
if you were, they would be streamed correctly.
Well, it is not my code, I was just trying to understand why fcl-web is
not working for the apache modules.
In Lazarus when one creates an apache module (package fpweb,
Martin Schreiber schrieb:
On Sunday 14 September 2008 19.22:13 Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Martin Schreiber schrieb:
I tried with trunk, same result. The problem is probably that the second
constant string parameter has a wrong reference count. It is initially 0
instead of -1. The incref call at
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
No. First, imo it's more likely that the next release will be 2.4.0
and not 2.2.4, further, the changes are too big.
Do you have a todo for it? IOW, what is missing to start releasing of
2.4.0 (we need resources changes ;) )
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin.
14 matches
Mail list logo
