Re: [fpc-devel] FPC 2.2.2 on Linux/SPARC

2008-09-15 Thread Mark Morgan Lloyd
Jonas Maebe wrote: On 12 Sep 2008, at 22:28, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: I've run the test suite for the compiler with and without optimisation, so far I don't see any revealing differences in the output but I might be overlooking something significant due to inexperience. You can compare the

Re: [fpc-devel] parallel compilation support

2008-09-15 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, Jonas Maebe said: > >> to 5.3 seconds when adding -j 2 on my MacBook. > > > > Yes of course, since the RTL is special in that it has non build unit > > default. > > Build units are the exception rather than the rule under packages as > well. Most directories under packag

Re: [fpc-devel] parallel compilation support

2008-09-15 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 15 Sep 2008, at 09:58, Jonas Maebe wrote: Build units are the exception rather than the rule under packages as well. Most directories under packages are not parallellised themselves because no one went through the trouble of adding dependencies for individual units. Which in itself do

Re: [fpc-devel] parallel compilation support

2008-09-15 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 15 Sep 2008, at 09:52, Marco van de Voort wrote: In our previous episode, Jonas Maebe said: In our previous episode, Graeme Geldenhuys said: Via makefiles yes, and only on directory level. It also works at the unit level, e.g. the Darwin rtl. It goes from 8.6 to 5.3 seconds when ad

Re: [fpc-devel] clocale glibc extension patch

2008-09-15 Thread petr . kristan
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 08:44:24AM +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > > > On Mon, 15 Sep 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 06:47:42PM +0100, Jonas Maebe wrote: > > > > > > On 11 Sep 2008, at 16:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > >I'am author of initial impleme