On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 07:09:23PM +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> Given that I didn't even own or use Delphi at the time the system unit was
> first documented, this is strange news indeed.
I could be wrong (it has happened before :-).
Instead of having copied (like in retype) the doc f
Hi
I have some suggestions regarding the use of viewvc for publishing the
svn repository to the web.
1) update to viewvc 1.06. CHANGELOG:
http://viewvc.tigris.org/source/browse/viewvc/trunk/CHANGES?rev=HEAD
2) add source code coloring by installing highlight (from http://www.andre-simon.de
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 19:09:23 +0200 (CEST)
> Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 6 Oct 2008, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> >
> > > In our previous episode, Tom Verhoeff said:
> > > > I don't want to wake up sleeping d
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 19:09:23 +0200 (CEST)
Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 6 Oct 2008, Marco van de Voort wrote:
>
> > In our previous episode, Tom Verhoeff said:
> > > I don't want to wake up sleeping dogs, but while updating various
> > > slides to base them on Free
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> In our previous episode, Tom Verhoeff said:
> > I don't want to wake up sleeping dogs, but while updating various slides
> > to base them on FreePascal/Lazarus instead of Delphi, I found that
> > some documentation that I had copied from the Delphi
In our previous episode, Tom Verhoeff said:
> I don't want to wake up sleeping dogs, but while updating various slides
> to base them on FreePascal/Lazarus instead of Delphi, I found that
> some documentation that I had copied from the Delphi Help years ago
> (probably version 6 or so), is literall
On 06 Oct 2008, at 13:16, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
I did not test the merged revision in 2.2.1. Yes, I regret nor having
tested it. I had supposed it would work and it was merged right in the
end of the development process, so I had no time to test.
In such cases you should never as
I did not test the merged revision in 2.2.1. Yes, I regret nor having
tested it. I had supposed it would work and it was merged right in the
end of the development process, so I had no time to test.
But it doesn't matter. In 2.2.0 it accepts the code but it produces
wrong parameters, so what is th
On 06 Oct 2008, at 02:23, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
How would I procede to create the snapshot myself?
I really need it. I cannot create toolbars in Cocoa without static.
How did this error get into 2.2.2 in the first place? All I remember
about static is that you explicitly asked
