On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 07:34, Daniël Mantione
wrote:
> This is a debate that has been held quite a few times :) If you look at
> typed consts from the point of view what a mathematical constant is, yes,
> it's completely absurd that you can write to them.
>From _mathematical_ point of view assign
Op Mon, 2 Mar 2009, schreef Alexander Klenin:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 03:16, Daniël Mantione
wrote:
Making typed constants writeable has been a disputed feature of the Borland
dialect, I agree with that, but fact of the matter is they are writeable and
thus cannot form a constant expression.
ABorka schrieb:
> Sorry guys, I knew I should have called them service packs, not patches :)
>
> In the future I would like to do it in the right way, but I'm not
> exactly sure how. Lets say I check out the latest SVN and make some
> changes in a few files in /FCL-web/ .
> I generate a patch file
Sorry guys, I knew I should have called them service packs, not patches :)
In the future I would like to do it in the right way, but I'm not
exactly sure how. Lets say I check out the latest SVN and make some
changes in a few files in /FCL-web/ .
I generate a patch file which contains the diff
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 03:16, Daniël Mantione
wrote:
> Making typed constants writeable has been a disputed feature of the Borland
> dialect, I agree with that, but fact of the matter is they are writeable and
> thus cannot form a constant expression. The fact that there exists a $J
> directive d
Op Mon, 2 Mar 2009, schreef Alexander Klenin:
Since issue http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13256 was marked resolved,
I think this is quite reasonable to expect this to work.
The writeability of constants is IMNSHO just an ugly leftover from
Delphi history,
and should be disabled in _bot
Alexander Klenin a écrit :
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 07:15, m2 wrote:
Alexander Klenin a écrit :
So, should I write one or did I just not searched in the right place?
There is my NX library (still alpha) at
htpp://www.ellipsa.net/
Now, this code is much more pleasant to read ;-)
A few questio
On 01 Mar 2009, at 16:16, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 01 Mar 2009, at 15:58, Alexander Klenin wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 00:47, Jonas Maebe
wrote:
This depends on a mode switch. Use {$j-} to turn off the ability
to write to
typed constants. Maybe it's off by default in your version of
De
On 01 Mar 2009, at 15:58, Alexander Klenin wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 00:47, Jonas Maebe
wrote:
This depends on a mode switch. Use {$j-} to turn off the ability to
write to
typed constants. Maybe it's off by default in your version of Delphi.
I know. I argued that it should be off by
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 00:47, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>> Is rejected by Delphi, but compiled by FPC, which is a compatibility
>> bug in itself.
>
> This depends on a mode switch. Use {$j-} to turn off the ability to write to
> typed constants. Maybe it's off by default in your version of Delphi.
I know
On 01 Mar 2009, at 15:29, Alexander Klenin wrote:
I think this is quite reasonable to expect this to work.
The writeability of constants is IMNSHO just an ugly leftover from
Delphi history,
and should be disabled in _both_ delphi and objfpc modes:
{$IFDEF FPC}{$MODE DELPHI}{$ENDIF}
const x: in
Since issue http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13256 was marked resolved,
I can not add comments, so I'd like to discuss it here.
Original report claimed that code
const c: SomeType = ;
var y: t = c;
begin
end.
Works for primitive types, but not the complex ones.
This was an error on my part
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 20:07, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>> 3) Finally, and relevantly for this list,
>> should something like this be included into FPC?
> Imo in principle, yes, but:
> - simpler than NX library in the sense of less functionally, putting
> something like NX library in FPC is too m
>
> So next time (not this time, we're already on it now) provide small
> patches if you can and try not to include old patches into new ones.
> Although I do admit that that's more work, that way we can apply faster
> and that way it's easier for you to make new changes...
If one has more patche
Alexander Klenin schrieb:
> 3) Finally, and relevantly for this list,
> should something like this be included into FPC?
Imo in principle, yes, but:
- simpler than NX library in the sense of less functionally, putting
something like NX library in FPC is too much imo.
- cross platform
- FPC rtl
Op zaterdag 28-02-2009 om 22:06 uur [tijdzone -0800], schreef ABorka:
> I posted the following patch as
> http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13254
>
> (includes the changes posted in 13250 and 13228 too)
It takes soo long before the patches are applied because they are too
large. ;)
Now you
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009, ABorka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I posted the following patch as
> http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13254
>
> (includes the changes posted in 13250 and 13228 too)
I am looking at the patch and will apply it ASAP.
Michael.
___
fpc-
17 matches
Mail list logo
