[fpc-devel] Re: freepascal support for debian armhf

2011-09-07 Thread Wookey
+++ peter green [2011-09-06 02:05 +0100]: First a bit of background, on arm ebi gcc has three options for -mfloat-abi soft: do all floating point in software, ignore the fpu type selection softfp: use the selected fpu type but use the same calling conventions as soft (that is parameters are

Re: [fpc-devel] Re: freepascal support for debian armhf

2011-09-07 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 06 Sep 2011, at 14:00, Wookey wrote: section 5 tells you about the calling conventions, and section 6 about the normal variants (note the bit about it applying only to non-variadic functions - does pascal support variadic functions?) It does, in two ways: a) calling variadic functions

[fpc-devel] Merge request to FPC 2.6

2011-09-07 Thread Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
Hello, Is it still in time to request mergers? I'd like to request a merge of all changes from fpvectorial since the branching. http://svn.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/trunk/packages/fpvectorial/?view=log thanks, -- Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho

Re: [fpc-devel] Merge request to FPC 2.6

2011-09-07 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho said: Is it still in time to request mergers? I'd like to request a merge of all changes from fpvectorial since the branching. http://svn.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/trunk/packages/fpvectorial/?view=log There are only two, 18977,

Re: [fpc-devel] Merge request to FPC 2.6

2011-09-07 Thread Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl wrote: There are only two, 18977, and the one you just committed. Yes, but the last one breaks backwards compatibility, so I though that it would be better if people already use the new layout. Plus it also changes the

Re: [fpc-devel] Merge request to FPC 2.6

2011-09-07 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho said: On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl wrote: There are only two, 18977, and the one you just committed. ( http://www.stack.nl/~marcov/mergelogs26/ and then fpvectorial ) Yes, but the last one breaks

Re: [fpc-devel] Include files with double names

2011-09-07 Thread Joost van der Sluis
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 21:58 +0200, Jonas Maebe wrote: On 06 Sep 2011, at 21:48, Joost van der Sluis wrote: Can someone reproduce this? And what to do now? I've even did a touch on the rtl/objpas/parser.inc, but that doesn't help. If you perform a top level make all, the RTL and packages

Re: [fpc-devel] Include files with double names

2011-09-07 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 07 Sep 2011, at 16:29, Joost van der Sluis wrote: On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 21:58 +0200, Jonas Maebe wrote: On 06 Sep 2011, at 21:48, Joost van der Sluis wrote: Can someone reproduce this? And what to do now? I've even did a touch on the rtl/objpas/parser.inc, but that doesn't help. If

[fpc-devel] Are debug info in PPU already encoded stabs/dwarf?

2011-09-07 Thread Martin
Well what happens when: - you compile a package with stabs - your program with dwarf Or vice/versa. What will be in the final exe? Is the debug info in the ppu already format specific, or generic. Will the stabs end up together with the dwarf? Martin

Re: [fpc-devel] Are debug info in PPU already encoded stabs/dwarf?

2011-09-07 Thread Vincent Snijders
2011/9/7 Martin laza...@mfriebe.de: Well what happens when: - you compile a package with stabs - your program with dwarf Or vice/versa. What will be in the final exe? Is the debug info in the ppu already format specific, or generic. Will the stabs end up together with the dwarf? As far

RE : [fpc-devel] Are debug info in PPU already encoded stabs/dwarf?

2011-09-07 Thread Ludo Brands
Well what happens when: - you compile a package with stabs - your program with dwarf Or vice/versa. What will be in the final exe? Both Is the debug info in the ppu already format specific, or generic. Will the stabs end up together with the dwarf? Stabs go to the .stabs and