+++ peter green [2011-09-06 02:05 +0100]:
First a bit of background, on arm ebi gcc has three options for
-mfloat-abi
soft: do all floating point in software, ignore the fpu type selection
softfp: use the selected fpu type but use the same calling
conventions as soft (that is parameters are
On 06 Sep 2011, at 14:00, Wookey wrote:
section 5 tells you about the calling conventions, and section 6 about
the normal variants (note the bit about it applying only to
non-variadic functions - does pascal support variadic functions?)
It does, in two ways:
a) calling variadic functions
Hello,
Is it still in time to request mergers? I'd like to request a merge of
all changes from fpvectorial since the branching.
http://svn.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/trunk/packages/fpvectorial/?view=log
thanks,
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
In our previous episode, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho said:
Is it still in time to request mergers? I'd like to request a merge of
all changes from fpvectorial since the branching.
http://svn.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/trunk/packages/fpvectorial/?view=log
There are only two, 18977,
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl wrote:
There are only two, 18977, and the one you just committed.
Yes, but the last one breaks backwards compatibility, so I though that
it would be better if people already use the new layout. Plus it also
changes the
In our previous episode, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho said:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl wrote:
There are only two, 18977, and the one you just committed.
( http://www.stack.nl/~marcov/mergelogs26/ and then fpvectorial )
Yes, but the last one breaks
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 21:58 +0200, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 06 Sep 2011, at 21:48, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Can someone reproduce this? And what to do now? I've even did a touch on
the rtl/objpas/parser.inc, but that doesn't help.
If you perform a top level make all, the RTL and packages
On 07 Sep 2011, at 16:29, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 21:58 +0200, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 06 Sep 2011, at 21:48, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Can someone reproduce this? And what to do now? I've even did a
touch on
the rtl/objpas/parser.inc, but that doesn't help.
If
Well what happens when:
- you compile a package with stabs
- your program with dwarf
Or vice/versa.
What will be in the final exe?
Is the debug info in the ppu already format specific, or generic.
Will the stabs end up together with the dwarf?
Martin
2011/9/7 Martin laza...@mfriebe.de:
Well what happens when:
- you compile a package with stabs
- your program with dwarf
Or vice/versa.
What will be in the final exe?
Is the debug info in the ppu already format specific, or generic.
Will the stabs end up together with the dwarf?
As far
Well what happens when:
- you compile a package with stabs
- your program with dwarf
Or vice/versa.
What will be in the final exe?
Both
Is the debug info in the ppu already format specific, or
generic. Will the stabs end up together with the dwarf?
Stabs go to the .stabs and
11 matches
Mail list logo