On 22/09/11 08:28, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 21.09.2011 22:45, schrieb Henry Vermaak:
On 20 September 2011 12:18, Henry Vermaakhenry.verm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 September 2011 11:55, Sash0kvodka_pl...@mail.ru wrote:
So, what can I do next? My goal is get stable fpc + mseide for
Toshiba AC100
Am 22.09.2011 10:37, schrieb Henry Vermaak:
On 22/09/11 08:28, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 21.09.2011 22:45, schrieb Henry Vermaak:
On 20 September 2011 12:18, Henry Vermaakhenry.verm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 20 September 2011 11:55, Sash0kvodka_pl...@mail.ru wrote:
So, what can I do next? My goal
On 22/09/11 09:53, Sven Barth wrote:
The second case is interesting indeed. It's a pity that we don't know
what failed exactly in the compile... one would need a 2.4.4 with
included debug information for that.
If I were to build one, what can be done to remedy the problem? This is
what I
Sven Barth wrote:
Am 21.09.2011 22:45, schrieb Henry Vermaak:
On 20 September 2011 12:18, Henry Vermaakhenry.verm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 20 September 2011 11:55, Sash0kvodka_pl...@mail.ru wrote:
So, what can I do next? My goal is get stable fpc + mseide for
Toshiba AC100 device.
I've
Am 22.09.2011 11:26, schrieb Henry Vermaak:
On 22/09/11 09:53, Sven Barth wrote:
The second case is interesting indeed. It's a pity that we don't know
what failed exactly in the compile... one would need a 2.4.4 with
included debug information for that.
If I were to build one, what can be
On 22 September 2011 10:28, Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 22.09.2011 11:26, schrieb Henry Vermaak:
On 22/09/11 09:53, Sven Barth wrote:
The second case is interesting indeed. It's a pity that we don't know
what failed exactly in the compile... one would need a 2.4.4 with
Am 22.09.2011 11:26, schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
Sven Barth wrote:
Am 21.09.2011 22:45, schrieb Henry Vermaak:
On 20 September 2011 12:18, Henry Vermaakhenry.verm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 20 September 2011 11:55, Sash0kvodka_pl...@mail.ru wrote:
So, what can I do next? My goal is get stable
On 22 September 2011 10:26, Mark Morgan Lloyd
markmll.fpc-de...@telemetry.co.uk wrote:
I got from there to 2.4 via (I think) 2.5 with Jonas's help, and since then
have moved it between local machines as a binary. I can confirm that 2.4.4
will build FPC trunk (2.7.1) on ARM, and that that can
Am 22.09.2011 11:48, schrieb Henry Vermaak:
On 22 September 2011 10:28, Sven Barthpascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 22.09.2011 11:26, schrieb Henry Vermaak:
On 22/09/11 09:53, Sven Barth wrote:
The second case is interesting indeed. It's a pity that we don't know
what failed exactly in
Am 22.09.2011 11:51, schrieb Henry Vermaak:
On 22 September 2011 10:26, Mark Morgan Lloyd
markmll.fpc-de...@telemetry.co.uk wrote:
I got from there to 2.4 via (I think) 2.5 with Jonas's help, and since then
have moved it between local machines as a binary. I can confirm that 2.4.4
will build
Hi,
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:26:13 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Sven Barth wrote:
Am 21.09.2011 22:45, schrieb Henry Vermaak:
On 20 September 2011 12:18, Henry Vermaakhenry.verm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 20 September 2011 11:55, Sash0kvodka_pl...@mail.ru wrote:
So, what can I do next? My
On 22/09/11 11:23, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
That is a known issue with 2.4.4 that it does not compile trunk with
optimization turned on. There seems to be a bug that has been existing
for a long time that has been triggered by code changes in 18230; the
ARM compiler is not as well maintained as
Henry Vermaak wrote:
On 22 September 2011 10:26, Mark Morgan Lloyd
markmll.fpc-de...@telemetry.co.uk wrote:
I got from there to 2.4 via (I think) 2.5 with Jonas's help, and since then
have moved it between local machines as a binary. I can confirm that 2.4.4
will build FPC trunk (2.7.1) on ARM,
On 22 Sep 2011, at 13:26, Sash0k wrote:
But in the future I plan to migrate to Debian hardfloat port: http://wiki.debian.org/ArmHardFloatPo
rt
Note that this ABI is not supported by FPC at this time.
Jonas___
fpc-devel maillist -
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Henry Vermaak wrote:
On 22 September 2011 10:26, Mark Morgan Lloyd
markmll.fpc-de...@telemetry.co.uk wrote:
I got from there to 2.4 via (I think) 2.5 with Jonas's help, and
since then
have moved it between local machines as a binary. I can confirm that
2.4.4
will
On 9/22/2011 03:28, Sven Barth wrote:
Compiling the trunk compiler is only supported when using the latest release
(currently 2.4.4) as a starting compiler.
where in the SVN can this be pulled from, please. would it be (from memory)
tags/release_2_4_4?
On 22.09.2011 18:03, waldo kitty wrote:
On 9/22/2011 03:28, Sven Barth wrote:
Compiling the trunk compiler is only supported when using the latest
release
(currently 2.4.4) as a starting compiler.
where in the SVN can this be pulled from, please. would it be (from
memory) tags/release_2_4_4?
Hi,
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:28:48 +0100, Henry Vermaak wrote:
On 22/09/11 11:23, Thomas Schatzl wrote:
That is a known issue with 2.4.4 that it does not compile trunk with
optimization turned on. There seems to be a bug that has been
existing
for a long time that has been triggered by code
I use latest FPC from /trunk/ and this problem just started happening recently.
Pseudo code
Write To SQL as Blob (using parameter binding)
Param.AsString=uInt64Array.toBlob(MyList);
unit uInt64Array
procedure fromBlob(List,string)
count=length(string) div 8; // size of int64
Did anyone recently do work on BLOB features to MySQL 5.1 connector?
there was commited only this
http://svn.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/trunk/packages/fcl-db/src/sqldb/mysql/mysqlconn.inc?r1=17417r2=18951
which introduced mapping from MySQL TEXT datatype (character LOB) to
20 matches
Mail list logo
