Op Tue, 11 Sep 2012, schreef Alexander Klenin:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.be wrote:
If you want to do that, you need to add a layer in between that converts the
sets into integer bitmasks in a reliable, portable and future-proof way.
How about
On 11 Sep 2012, at 06:18, Alexander Klenin kle...@gmail.com wrote:
How about packed sets? Do they have well-defined memory layout? If
not, then maybe they should?
Set packing only influences the number of bytes occupied by sets, not their
internal layout. And I don't think that should
In our previous episode, Dani?l Mantione said:
Sets, are a bit more complicated: Their binary layout is defined in
Borland documentation, but this one of the few issues were FPC didn't
follow Borland. FPC has smallsets, up to 32 items and longsets, up to 256
items.
That's outdated, running
