On 02/14/2013 03:57 AM, Mike Salish wrote:
All that is missing is the 68K code generator and RTL and... a few
more bits.
AFAIK, The 68 K compiler is currently being worked on and already is
able to do something useful.
I have not heard about that project since some weeks, so I don't know
On 02/15/2013 02:46 AM, Michel Catudal wrote:
I am asking because modern PIC32MX Controllers from Microchip are mips
based, I somehow prefer arm-microcontrollers but when you want to
build something small and cheap the Microchip controllers still have
an advantage...
Same here.
AFAIK
In our previous episode, Michael Schnell said:
Same here.
AFAIK Microchip is planning PIC32 variants with even more internal RAM
and ROM. Same would be very handy for our (and others) embedded
controllers.
Pity that they have a five stage pipeline though. Though the 16-bit lines now
have
On 02/15/2013 10:14 AM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Pity that they have a five stage pipeline though. Though the 16-bit lines now
have
more stalls too (the e series is further away from the 1 clock one 1
instruction principle than the f was).
I suppose the design goal was using as little hardware
Am 15.02.2013 08:39 schrieb Mike Salish m...@avantisys.com:
It was interesting to see renewed activity in the compiler for the 68K
architecture. I've been using another old compiler, written in Pascal, for
embedded development for many years and been wanting to give FPC a try. My
existing
revision 23621
Win 32 / Vista
RTL build with OPT=-gl -gw -godwarfsets -O-1
compiler build with OPT=-gl -O3 -Or -CpPENTIUMM -OpPENTIUMM
Lazarus -WC -gh -Criot -gw2 -godwarfsets -O-1 -gt
The following line crashes with SigSegV
writestr(BaseConf, AType,':',
' IMode=',
