Re: [fpc-devel] Is target mips-embedded possible / planned?

2013-05-17 Thread Michel Catudal
Le 2013-05-17 03:42, Michael Schnell a écrit : > I did not do anything on PIC32, yet, but using the non-JTAG native PIC > interface with PIC24 and PICKit performance is (AFAIRemenber) something like > one second for 32 K and a fraction of a second using ICD3. > > So JTAG with PIC is really disapp

Re: [fpc-devel] Is target mips-embedded possible / planned?

2013-05-17 Thread Michel Catudal
Le 2013-05-17 03:36, Michael Schnell a écrit : > On 05/17/2013 02:42 AM, Michel Catudal wrote: >> using the PE from Microchip. > What is "PE" ? > > If you intend to use a PIC as an interface chip why not just use a PICKit as > the hardware and implement your software on same ? > > In fact Microchi

Re: [fpc-devel] Status report for "class helpers"

2013-05-17 Thread Sven Barth
Am 29.01.2011 21:30, schrieb Florian Klämpfl: Am 29.01.2011 19:04, schrieb Paul Ishenin: 30.01.2011 0:50, Sven Barth wrote: Should I add the flag set to TSymtable or tstoredsymtable? (only the latter can write/save itself to ppu) I would add it to TSymTable. I really wonder that symtables hav

Re: [fpc-devel] Is target mips-embedded possible / planned?

2013-05-17 Thread Michael Schnell
I did not do anything on PIC32, yet, but using the non-JTAG native PIC interface with PIC24 and PICKit performance is (AFAIRemenber) something like one second for 32 K and a fraction of a second using ICD3. So JTAG with PIC is really disappointing. -Michael

Re: [fpc-devel] Is target mips-embedded possible / planned?

2013-05-17 Thread Michael Schnell
On 05/17/2013 02:42 AM, Michel Catudal wrote: using the PE from Microchip. What is "PE" ? If you intend to use a PIC as an interface chip why not just use a PICKit as the hardware and implement your software on same ? In fact Microchip themselves sell the PICKit hardware with multiple firmw