For those reading this on fpc-devel the context is that the upload of
fpc 2.6.2 to debian failed on most architectures and I would like
upstream input on sorting it out.
Abou Al Montacir wrote:
Many targets are broken: powerpc, sparc, armel, armhf. The error message
looks very similar on 3 tar
This is looking good now on first view, all statements seem to pass
through now.
The only thing not working is the register error in mfc0 (and friends)
command.
Now I will wade through some more code to find out why my nice param
-CpMIPS32R2 is ignored by assembler, it still defaults to MIPS
Le 2013-05-29 03:01, Paul Ishenin a écrit :
> 29.05.2013 14:06, Michel Catudal пишет:
>
>> The one that I compiled before the code was broken
>
> To answer on your question I need to know paticular compiler version.
>
> Best regards,
> Paul Ishenin
>
>
>
Here is more detailed info. I guess my answ
29.05.2013 2:08, Sergei Gorelkin пишет:
29.05.2013 1:26, Michael Ring пишет:
I did the changes, parts of the opcodes now work fine, I think I have found the
problem with the li
+ and + mfc0 op-codes, if last parameter is 0 then the asm statement is
generated wrong:
This works:
and$a0
Hi,
On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 15:01 +0800, Paul Ishenin wrote:
> 29.05.2013 14:06, Michel Catudal пишет:
>
> > The one that I compiled before the code was broken
(note: the last working armhf compiler was generated by daily builds on
8th of May)
>
> To answer on your question I need to know paticu
29.05.2013 14:06, Michel Catudal пишет:
The one that I compiled before the code was broken
To answer on your question I need to know paticular compiler version.
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org