Paul Ishenin schrieb:
30.12.2013 9:07, Hans-Peter Diettrich пишет:
Do you think that FPC should really reproduce all this inconsistent
behaviour? Who would test or even specify the compatible behaviour,
when every new variation will result in more unexpected results? IMO
it's much easier to
On Mon, 30 Dec 2013, Paul Ishenin wrote:
30.12.2013 9:07, Hans-Peter Diettrich пишет:
Do you think that FPC should really reproduce all this inconsistent
behaviour? Who would test or even specify the compatible behaviour, when
every new variation will result in more unexpected results? IMO
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich
drdiettri...@aol.comwrote:
var a: AnsiString; u: UTF8String;
function cpy(s: RawByteString):RawByteString;
begin Result := s; end;
a := cpy(u); //now a has encoding UTF-8!
Here the XE compiler omits the conversion of the RawByteString
30.12.2013 18:33, Michael Van Canneyt пишет:
So how one can help at this stage:
1. Check related FPC tests and write new for the missing cases.
2. Compare FPC and Delphi RTL classes which had beed adjusted in
Delphi during the unicodestring move and check whether something
minor can be added
On Mon, 30 Dec 2013, Paul Ishenin wrote:
30.12.2013 18:33, Michael Van Canneyt пишет:
So how one can help at this stage:
1. Check related FPC tests and write new for the missing cases.
2. Compare FPC and Delphi RTL classes which had beed adjusted in Delphi
during the unicodestring move
30.12.2013 20:25, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
But the experiments for ansi/unicode RTL are already in trunk. Do
you plan to take them out ?
By experiments I ment having 2 (or 1.5) RTL with unicode + ansi
classes which we planned to solve using namespaces.
What good is having the unicode
In our previous episode, Paul Ishenin said:
I don't think that this is a good idea, it means that e.g.
TStrings.SaveToFile() or TFileStream.Create() is still crippled.
Better bite the bullet. This is what I wanted to test in feb/march.
This will also mean that we will release 2.8 much
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
But the experiments for ansi/unicode RTL are already in trunk.
Do you plan to take them out ?
and:
What good is having the unicode string support if none of the classes or
units make use of it ?
Limited. But 2.8.x is not all about
On Mon, 30 Dec 2013, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Michael Van Canneyt said:
But the experiments for ansi/unicode RTL are already in trunk.
Do you plan to take them out ?
and:
What good is having the unicode string support if none of the classes or
units make use of it
30.12.2013 20:59, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
That was my idea.
If it turns out to be really impossible, we can still do as Paul
suggests, but if it works, I would attempt to release 2.8 with dotted
units.
In each case, the ground work will be done in a branch, so as not to
irreversibly
10 matches
Mail list logo
