Re: [fpc-devel] multi version ppudump

2015-12-02 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 16:49:30 +0100 (CET) Michael Van Canneyt wrote: >[...] > Hm. ppudump should be backwards compatible ? Or at least, that was the > original design ? AFAIK it never supported older versions. For example: pascal/3.0.0/fpc/compiler/utils/ppudump -Fj

[fpc-devel] multi version ppudump

2015-12-02 Thread Mattias Gaertner
Hi, Short: The default install (e.g. make install and most installers) replaces the ppudump utility, reducing its usefulness. For example when Lazarus should support code navigation without sources it requires a working ppudump. Long: When installing a second version of FPC via 'make install'

Re: [fpc-devel] multi version ppudump

2015-12-02 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 2 Dec 2015, Mattias Gaertner wrote: Hi, Short: The default install (e.g. make install and most installers) replaces the ppudump utility, reducing its usefulness. For example when Lazarus should support code navigation without sources it requires a working ppudump. Hm. ppudump

[fpc-devel] Starting compiler of 3.1.1 still shows 2.6.4

2015-12-02 Thread Mattias Gaertner
Hi, Is this correct? It works with 2.6.4 and 3.0.0. Mattias ___ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Re: [fpc-devel] multi version ppudump

2015-12-02 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 2 Dec 2015, Mattias Gaertner wrote: On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 16:49:30 +0100 (CET) Michael Van Canneyt wrote: [...] Hm. ppudump should be backwards compatible ? Or at least, that was the original design ? AFAIK it never supported older versions. For example:

Re: [fpc-devel] multi version ppudump

2015-12-02 Thread Sven Barth
Am 02.12.2015 17:40 schrieb "Michael Van Canneyt" : > > > > On Wed, 2 Dec 2015, Mattias Gaertner wrote: > >> On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 16:49:30 +0100 (CET) >> Michael Van Canneyt wrote: >> >>> [...] >>> Hm. ppudump should be backwards compatible ? Or at

[fpc-devel] Inconsistent use of Timeout in SimpleIPC

2015-12-02 Thread Denis Kozlov
Hello, Current use of Timeout parameter in TSimpleIPCServer.PeekMessage: * >0 -- number of milliseconds to wait. * 0 -- not documented and inconsistent! * Windows -- wait infinitely (forced via MsgWaitForMultipleObjects) * Unix -- return immediately (implicit via fpSelect) * OS/2 -- return