Seems I misunderstood the meaning of "MacOSXVersionMin", it is set to
10.5 on my MacOS Mojave !!??!!
So the patch gets even more simple:
Index: compiler/systems/t_bsd.pas
===
--- compiler/systems/t_bsd.pas (revision 39358)
+++
This small patch helped me to get rid of the need to define
-XR/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX.sdk/ in /etc/fpc.cfg
It would be greet to have something similar in the upcoming 3.0.5
release (and of course in trunk) so that also building lazarus with a
3.0.5 compiler works (It
I only adjusted -Fl to match the current version installed, having a
wrong issue there did not change the build behaviour. The change
necessary was to include
-XR/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX.sdk/
otherwise fpcmake will not compile.
Cross-Compiling did however not work,
On 01/07/18 22:18, Michael Ring wrote:
make clean buildbase CPU_TARGET=x86_64 INSTALL_PREFIX=$HOME/3.1.1
FPCOPT="-XR/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools//SDKs/MacOSX.sdk/"
and patching my /etc/fpc.cfg to include:
#ifdef cpui386
-XR/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX.sdk/
We've had this discussion (Jonas and me) a looong time ago (2013) with
MacOS Maverics
In the past, when xcode commandline tools was installed it created a
link to crt1.10.5.o in /usr/lib.
It now seems that this is not done anymore (at least not on my
computer...) and as /usr/lib is
Am 01.07.2018 um 20:49 schrieb Jonas Maebe:
> On 01/07/18 20:27, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>> Am 23.06.2018 um 10:48 schrieb Jonas Maebe:
>>> I doubt this is a major contributor to that fact (especially since
>>> implicit exception frames are disabled for the compiler binary, so
>>> ansistrings
On 01/07/18 20:27, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Am 23.06.2018 um 10:48 schrieb Jonas Maebe:
I doubt this is a major contributor to that fact (especially since
implicit exception frames are disabled for the compiler binary, so
ansistrings don't result in extra exception frames).
I tested on
Am 23.06.2018 um 10:48 schrieb Jonas Maebe:
>> Personally, if I had any stake in this, I would be against it. I mean,
>> FPC is already slower than DCC.
>
> I doubt this is a major contributor to that fact (especially since
> implicit exception frames are disabled for the compiler binary, so
>
2018-06-30 11:03 GMT+02:00 Sven Barth via fpc-devel <
fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org>:
> mORMot is a third party project that can be used with FPC while Delphi is
> essentially a template and base line for compatibility, so there is a
> difference between the two. Though if you have a formal name
