Saying that though, despite the near-identical time, what's the size of
the binary like? It should be the same or slightly smaller, but
(hopefully) never larger.
Gareth aka. Kit
On Sun 09/12/18 03:32 , "Ryan Joseph" r...@thealchemistguild.com sent:
> On Dec 9, 2018, at 9:15 AM, J. Gareth
Hmmm, it might imply that the overhaul isn't worth it except for the
largest projects. I guess we'll have to let Florian make that call.
I'm not sure how to time the optimisation stage separately, unless you're
able to pass in the PPU files directly. Other factors like reading from
the disk
> On Dec 9, 2018, at 9:15 AM, J. Gareth Moreton
> wrote:
>
> Hmmm, that's a shame if the time difference is so small. Up to you if it's
> worth it or not. I hoped it would be slightly better than that, although if
> it's consistently faster, especially with large projects, then it's a
got it compiling but I need a better way to specify the changed rtl/package
units. I just did a “make clean all” but I need to specify the new location of
the rtf/packages units which are no longer in the default locations.
Is there a better way than adding tons of -Fu’s in the command line?
Hmmm, that's a shame if the time difference is so small. Up to you if
it's worth it or not. I hoped it would be slightly better than that,
although if it's consistently faster, especially with large projects, then
it's a winner in my eyes. Fingers crossed!
Gareth aka. Kit
On Sun 09/12/18
> On Dec 9, 2018, at 9:02 AM, J. Gareth Moreton
> wrote:
>
> (This should probably be on the mailing list because it's helpful to everyone)
>
> Hmmm, I'm not sure about that one - those shouldn't be affected. Just the
> standard "make clean all" should work.
>
> However, the document here
Got everything building finally but the time difference is so small I'll need
to make a script to compile multiple times and average all the runs. Is it even
worth the time doing that?
Regards,
Ryan Joseph
___
fpc-devel maillist -
(This should probably be on the mailing list because it's helpful to
everyone)
Hmmm, I'm not sure about that one - those shouldn't be affected. Just
the standard "make clean all" should work.
However, the document here contains everything about building FPC:
I'm not sure. I've always had problems
with patch.exe. I personally use "svn
patch", which works for me both under
Windows and Linux.
I hope this works better.
Gareth aka. Kit
On Sun 09/12/18 01:56 , "Ryan Joseph"
r...@thealchemistguild.com sent:
> I was stupid and didn’t use the right
Couldn’t figure out the patching. I tried a dry run but it doesn’t seem to find
the file.
Downloaded from svn
cd trunk
patch < /Users/ryanjoseph/Downloads/overhaul-64-32-split.patch --dry-run
(Stripping trailing CRs from patch.)
can't find file to patch at input line 5
Perhaps you should have
I was stupid and didn’t use the right options. They work now except this one:
sudo patch -p0 < /Users/ryanjoseph/Downloads/overhaul-base.patch
(Stripping trailing CRs from patch.)
patching file compiler/aopt.pas
patch: malformed patch at line 15: Index: compiler/aoptbase.pas
did it fail?
Had any luck with this?
Gareth aka. Kit
On Fri 07/12/18 01:26 , Ryan Joseph
r...@thealchemistguild.com sent:
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 7, 2018, at 5:11 AM, J. Gareth
Moreton
> e...@moreton-family.com> wrote:
> >
>
> > Does anyone have other test projects
to compile
> that would give more
12 matches
Mail list logo
