Am 21.04.2021 um 20:05 schrieb Ryan Joseph via fpc-devel:
On Apr 20, 2021, at 11:38 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
All four string types provide built in > and < operators:
On a side note how do you even make overloads (or type helpers for that matter)
for short strings because String[10] isn't the
> On Apr 21, 2021, at 12:57 PM, Sven Barth via fpc-devel
> wrote:
>
> You can only use global operators with objects.
yes but not with *generic* objects. I find it very hard to understand why this
is being blocked for objects. Without this there is no way to have *generic*
record inheritanc
Am 21.04.2021 um 15:44 schrieb Benito van der Zander via fpc-devel:
Hi,
what about overloading operators for OBJECTs?
They do not conflict with any default operators.
I expected this to work, but it did not compile:
type generic TXQHashset = object //(specialize
TXQBaseHashmap)...
c
Am 21.04.2021 um 16:54 schrieb Ryan Joseph via fpc-devel:
On Apr 18, 2021, at 1:37 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
It has been decided back when operator overloads were introduced that they do
not replace existing, built in operators. This decision still stands. And we
see no reason to change that. T
> On Apr 20, 2021, at 11:38 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
>
> All four string types provide built in > and < operators:
On a side note how do you even make overloads (or type helpers for that matter)
for short strings because String[10] isn't the same type as String[100]?
Regards,
Ryan Josep
> On Apr 18, 2021, at 1:37 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
>
> It has been decided back when operator overloads were introduced that they do
> not replace existing, built in operators. This decision still stands. And we
> see no reason to change that. This way a user can *rely* on what a certain
> ope
> On Apr 21, 2021, at 7:44 AM, Benito van der Zander via fpc-devel
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> what about overloading operators for OBJECTs?
>
> They do not conflict with any default operators.
>
> I expected this to work, but it did not compile:
>
>
>
> type generic TXQHashset = object //(s
Hi,
what about overloading operators for OBJECTs?
They do not conflict with any default operators.
I expected this to work, but it did not compile:
type generic TXQHashset = object //(specialize
TXQBaseHashmap)...
class operator =(const a, b: TXQHashset): boolean;
end;
Cheers,
Be
