> On Jan 30, 2024, at 8:53 PM, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-devel
> wrote:
>
> 'yes I do' what exactly ?
>
> I thought I understood after your previous mail. Now I read your sentence as
> an argument for not having a "final" at all, so this is again confusing for
> me :/
I stepped in the mi
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024, Hairy Pixels via fpc-devel wrote:
On Jan 30, 2024, at 8:01 PM, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-devel
wrote:
It's probably more correct to say that you don't want there to be an override
in a descendent class. Offhand I can't think of a use-case, but why not...
yes you
> On Jan 30, 2024, at 8:01 PM, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-devel
> wrote:
>
> It's probably more correct to say that you don't want there to be an override
> in a descendent class. Offhand I can't think of a use-case, but why not...
yes you do, because the descendent doesn't know the class in
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024, Hairy Pixels via fpc-devel wrote:
On Jan 30, 2024, at 3:56 AM, Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-devel
wrote:
Unfortunately I still don't understand after your explanation what adding
'final' is supposed to accomplish. It may well be legitimate, but I have
currently no o
