Thanks Michael!
OK, that's partially good news :)
I understand that streaming records by default to LFM would lead to
too many questions (and I'm unsure whether Delphi does it too, for
records and DFM). If this means they are not allowed in the
"published" section, *but* the RTTI is capable of te
Sorry, seems the VM itself went bonkers. All fine after a reboot of the
guest system.
On 17/08/2024 18:27, Martin Frb via fpc-devel wrote:
On 17/08/2024 17:25, Martin Frb via fpc-devel wrote:
Ok, right now, not sure where to start.
I have a modified Lazarus source, that I am trying to build.
On 17/08/2024 17:25, Martin Frb via fpc-devel wrote:
Ok, right now, not sure where to start.
I have a modified Lazarus source, that I am trying to build.
I tried with -va
it stopped a lot faster
90.461] (1) Unitsearch:
/home/m/laz/lazgit/components/datetimectrls/design/lib/x86_64-linux/
Ok, right now, not sure where to start.
I have a modified Lazarus source, that I am trying to build.
Only, when FPC tries to compile it, it never returns. And freezes my
Fedora (in a Virtualbox).
It will eventually (after an hour or longer) be killed by the OS. Which
at least at one time repor
On Sat, 17 Aug 2024, Kostas Michalopoulos via fpc-devel wrote:
On 8/16/24 8:40 PM, Michalis Kamburelis via fpc-devel wrote:
If we could instead just put TVector3 in the published section, and
make it exposed in the object inspector (maybe adding some additional
code to use RTTI, but that is
On Fri, 16 Aug 2024, Michalis Kamburelis via fpc-devel wrote:
You cannot publish records, and this is not planned.
This is because things like
MyClass.MyRecord.MyField:=12;
do not work as one would naively expect. It does work if you use a TPersistent
instead of a record (the very reason t
On 8/16/24 8:40 PM, Michalis Kamburelis via fpc-devel wrote:
If we could instead just put TVector3 in the published section, and
make it exposed in the object inspector (maybe adding some additional
code to use RTTI, but that is made *once*, not every time we need to
expose TVector3) this would b
