To somebody (probably Sven):
In FPC there is concept of stack based objects (object) that behave like
classes (with inheritance)?
Why not just extend this object with support for constructors and
destructors, and there is no need for the ARC?
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich
What about adding support for destructors to (advanced) records (and/or
inhertiance)?
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Fabrício Srdic
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In platforms with managed code (.NET, Java), objects are automatically
> freed by the memory manager / garbage collector.
>
> Would not it be
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Sergei Gorelkin
wrote:
> 24.01.2014 3:04, Martin Frb пишет:
>
> On 23/01/2014 22:26, August Oktobar wrote:
>>
>>> Hello, I have seen your mails about peephole optimization, so I wonder
>>> if you could look at this
>>>
I understand. BTW, in GCC compilers this is always inlined (int64 div X)
.
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 25 Sep 2013, at 00:11, August Oktobar wrote:
>
> Why this function cannot be inlined? In some code doing int64
> shifting/dividing math, it is
Why this function cannot be inlined? In some code doing int64
shifting/dividing math, it is not inlined as other similar compiler
functions (round, odd etc.)? i am using FPC 2.7.1 32 bit.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://l
