Hi,
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Henry Vermaak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/11/14 Fabio Dell'Aria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Hi to all,
>>
>> what are the FPC compiler switches I can use to obtain the smallest file
>> size?
>>
>> Has
Hi to all,
what are the FPC compiler switches I can use to obtain the smallest file size?
Has been improved the "Smart Link" feature in the new 2.3.x branch?
PS: I just know and use the "strip --strip-all" and "upx" commands.
--
Be
Yes, exactly! ;)
Thank you for your support! :)
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 11 Nov 2008, at 12:50, Fabio Dell'Aria wrote:
>
>> My last error is:
>>
>> C:/Programmi/Lazarus/fpc/2.2.2/bin/i386-win32/ppc3
OK, I found the error (wrong switches). ;)
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 11 Nov 2008, at 12:34, Fabio Dell'Aria wrote:
>
>> Hi Jonas,
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 11 Nov 2008, at 12:34, Fabio Dell'Aria wrote:
>
>> Hi Jonas,
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
Hi Jonas,
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 11 Nov 2008, at 11:03, Fabio Dell'Aria wrote:
>
>> how I can rebuild the FPC and RTL with custom switches?
>>
>> I wont to uses -CX -XX -U3 -Ur
>
> Execute t
Hi to all,
how I can rebuild the FPC and RTL with custom switches?
I wont to uses -CX -XX -U3 -Ur
--
Best regards...
Fabio Dell'Aria.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Hi to all,
is FreePascal able to compile for Itanium CPUs?
If not, there is a road-map to do this?
--
Best regards...
Fabio Dell'Aria.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Hi,
2008/1/21, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 21 Jan 2008, at 13:18, Fabio Dell'Aria wrote:
>
> > I have a little problem stripping my .EXE compiled file.
> >
> > The final size with the DEBUG symbols (from -gl flag) is: 65132 bytes
> >
>
159 bytes
What data are stored into this 25159 bytes?
How I can remove them?
--
Best regards...
Fabio Dell'Aria.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
ize of that
> > compiled by Borland.
>
> So, he couldn't read the FAQ:
>
> http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Lazarus_Faq#Why_are_the_generated_binaries_so_big.3F
Or we can apply this patch to the 2.2.2 branch! ;)
--
Best regards...
Fabio Dell'Aria.
___
ad.
See it here:
http://groups.google.com/group/borland.public.kylix.ide/browse_thread/thread/e6beff158e36b0b8
--
Best regards...
Fabio Dell'Aria.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Hi,
2008/1/18, Michael Schnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > I think is really most important can use it ASAP.
> >
> >
> Right ! See the latest posts in the Borland Kylix Newsgroup (that indeed
> still exists :) ).
What do you mean? :|
--
Hi,
2008/1/17, Joao Morais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Vincent Snijders wrote:
> > Fabio Dell'Aria schreef:
> >>
> >> Where I can find the "make" program (command) on Windows?
> >>
> >> On the FPC\bin I found only fpcmake.exe
>
Hi,
2008/1/17, Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Fabio Dell'Aria schreef:
> >
> > Where I can find the "make" program (command) on Windows?
> >
> > On the FPC\bin I found only fpcmake.exe
> >
>
> IMO, the best way to get it, is to
Hi to all,
can someone tell me if exists some units ables to read RAW data from a
specified section of an executable file (in all the supported
executable file format)?
--
Best regards...
Fabio Dell'Aria.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-
Hi,
2008/1/17, Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Fabio Dell'Aria schreef:
> >
> > I'm very confused.
> > I cannot build it!
> > Many errors.
> >
> > Why do not add a simple .bat file able to do all the works? :(
> >
>
> I c
Hi,
2008/1/17, Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Fabio Dell'Aria schreef:
> > Hi to all,
> >
> > I have just checkout the FPC 2.3.1 trunk from the SVN.
> >
> > Now I need to know how I can build FPC from its sources.
> >
> > Can so
Hi,
2008/1/17, Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Fabio Dell'Aria schreef:
> > Hi to all,
> >
> > I have just checkout the FPC 2.3.1 trunk from the SVN.
> >
> > Now I need to know how I can build FPC from its sources.
> >
> > Can so
Hi to all,
I have just checkout the FPC 2.3.1 trunk from the SVN.
Now I need to know how I can build FPC from its sources.
Can someone help me, please?
--
Best regards...
Fabio Dell'Aria.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepasca
Hi,
2008/1/17, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Fabio Dell'Aria wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2008/1/17, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Fabio
Hi,
2008/1/17, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Fabio Dell'Aria wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2008/1/17, Peter Vreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > Hi to all,
> > > >
> > > > I have
> couple of months it will be considered for inclusion.
Do you think it will be included in the next 2.2.2 stable release?
> > 2)...when will be added the full "lineinfo" and "lnfodwrf" units
> > supports to read the debuginfo from the external .dbg file?
>
y it works only on the last 2.3.x version)?
2)...when will be added the full "lineinfo" and "lnfodwrf" units
supports to read the debuginfo from the external .dbg file?
Thank you to all for your attention! ;)
--
Best regards...
Fabio Dell'Aria.
__
ild-id or a checksum verification.
>
> Peter
I'm sorry but I'm NOT ABLE to create a patch to read and verify the
gnu_debuglink section.
I'm ONLY able to search for an external .dbg file (the same of the
.exe but simply renamed).
So I think others must write this path
Hi,
2008/1/17, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Fabio Dell'Aria wrote:
>
> > Hi to all,
> >
> > I'm writing a patch to can use an external .dbg file during the
> > debugging process.
> >
> > All w
Hi,
2008/1/17, Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Fabio Dell'Aria schreef:
> > Hi to all,
> >
> > I'm writing a patch to can use an external .dbg file during the
> > debugging process.
> >
> > All works fine but when an unhandled except
e (if not found in the executable)?
--
Best regards...
Fabio Dell'Aria.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
p; objcopy --add-debug-link && strip" under
> windows. The external linker (e.g. linux) still be updated to support
> objcopy and strip when -Xg is passed.
>
>
> Peter
I have just try on Windows with objcopy (I have ownloaded it from the
mingw binutils binaries) and works like a charm.
The -Xg flag do not works. GDB tell me: "not found symbols".
PS: why do not add objcopy to the FPC bin folder?
--
Best regards...
Fabio Dell'Aria.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
> >
> > Do you know any simple method valid for all these OS?
Thank you very much!
Really simple and powerful! :)
--
Best regards...
Fabio Dell'Aria.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Hi to all,
I'm implementing a Console application.
I need to run external program and wait until it terminates (reading
the exit-code).
This on Windows, Linux and Mac-OS X.
Do you know any simple method valid for all these OS?
--
Best regards...
Fabio Dell
, as well as setting the file
> to execute.
> (gdb)
>
> from _EXECUTABLE_ file FILE, iow you still need the unstripped exe.
>
> It's like calling
>
> copy file1.exe file-debug.exe
> strip file1.exe
>
> and then pass file-debug.exe to gdb also.
Why not si
regards...
Fabio Dell'Aria.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Hi to all,
can someone tell me if exists a compiler/linker option to can change the
default Object File extension ".o" ?
--
Best regards...
Fabio Dell'Aria.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepas
Why do not update the UPX released with FPC with the last 3.02 stable
version?
Current it contain the old UPX 1.25 version.
--
Best regards...
Fabio Dell'Aria.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepasca
> http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
>
--
Best regards...
Fabio Dell'Aria.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
need to do it every time you compile your application.
>
> -Bee-
>
> has Bee.ography at:
> http://beeography.wordpress.com
>
> ___
> fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
&
Can you tell we more about the iirc gdb please?
2008/1/13, Marc Weustink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Daniël Mantione wrote:
> >
> >
> > Op Sat, 12 Jan 2008, schreef Fabio Dell'Aria:
> >
> >> OK, but why do not add the debug info in an external
AIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>
> Op Sat, 12 Jan 2008, schreef Fabio Dell'Aria:
>
> > OK, but why do not add the debug info in an external file (conform to
> > stabs/dwarf specification)?
>
> Because the debugger doesn't support this; the compiler can do it, but,
>
OK, but why do not add the debug info in an external file (conform to
stabs/dwarf specification)?
2008/1/12, Tomas Hajny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 12 Jan 08, at 17:23, Fabio Dell'Aria wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > but why isn't simply possible store as Source Code
Jonas___
> fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
> http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
>
--
Best regards...
Fabio Dell'Aria.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
and use less
RAM to generate compiled file);
2)...the beginner programmers do not stop to uses FreePascal for its BIG
compiled files.
What do you think of this my proposal?
--
Best regards...
Fabio Dell'Aria.
___
fpc-devel maillist - f
But if the doc is outdated then an old version works.
Is possible modify the current version to works (as the old version just
done)?
2007/12/28, Andrew Haines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Fabio Dell'Aria wrote:
> > But on the wiki I found same ppumove winnt
he PE-COFF file format
> does not support real shared libraries like they are supported under unix.
> If you try it you will
> get linking errors as shown above.
>
> Peter
>
>
> ___
> fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
>
Hi,
this is the results:
ld -shared -E -o system.dll system.o prt0.o
ld: prt0.o: No such file: No such file or directory
2007/12/28, Daniël Mantione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>
> Op Fri, 28 Dec 2007, schreef Fabio Dell'Aria:
>
> > OK, but how I can: "Make pp
OK, but how I can: "Make ppumove dump its linker script and find out what it
does wrong." ?
The -b options return the following .bat file:
ld -shared -E -o system.dll system.o
2007/12/28, Daniël Mantione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>
> Op Fri, 28 Dec 2007, schre
Hi,
can I simply add a bugreport in the Mantis Freepascal site related to this
issue?
2007/12/28, Daniël Mantione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>
> Op Fri, 28 Dec 2007, schreef Fabio Dell'Aria:
>
> > OK, but why on my PC:
> >
> > ppumove system
MAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>
> Op Thu, 27 Dec 2007, schreef Fabio Dell'Aria:
>
> > Yes but I just read the doc and I still obtain the following error:
> >
> > Processing system.ppu...Error: PPU is already in a library : system.ppu
> > Linking Error: no file
007, schreef Fabio Dell'Aria:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2007/12/27, Daniël Mantione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Op Thu, 27 Dec 2007, schreef Fabio Dell'Aria:
> >>
> >>> OK, but the important is that I can
Hi,
2007/12/27, Daniël Mantione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>
> Op Thu, 27 Dec 2007, schreef Fabio Dell'Aria:
>
> > OK, but the important is that I can do this (using only my needed
> units).
> >
> > Is this working on Win, Linux and MacOSX ?
>
>
OK, but the important is that I can do this (using only my needed units).
Is this working on Win, Linux and MacOSX ?
2007/12/27, Daniël Mantione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>
> Op Thu, 27 Dec 2007, schreef Fabio Dell'Aria:
>
> > Can I also dynamically link to a
Can I also dynamically link to all RTL units (system.pp included)?
2007/12/27, Daniël Mantione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>
> Op Thu, 27 Dec 2007, schreef Fabio Dell'Aria:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2007/12/27, Daniël Mantione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
Hi,
2007/12/27, Daniël Mantione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>
> Op Thu, 27 Dec 2007, schreef Fabio Dell'Aria:
>
> > Can I use PPUMOVE tool to simulate basic packages features?
>
> Depends, you can use ppumove to convert units into shared libraries and
> yo
Can I use PPUMOVE tool to simulate basic packages features?
2007/12/27, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Fabio Dell'Aria schrieb:
> > Ok but whitout the full package support many companies will never uses
> > Freepascal because is common think split
Ok but whitout the full package support many companies will never uses
Freepascal because is common think split big application in modules or
simply sell extra application plugins.
What do you think about?
2007/12/26, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Fabio Dell'Aria schrieb:
Ok, but do you think exists a so simple technology to can create
plugin in freepascal (without use packages)?
2007/12/26, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Fabio Dell'Aria schrieb:
> > Ok,but if time is the only problem then why do not simple add the
> > f
in
the 2.6 version.
2007/12/26, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Fabio Dell'Aria schrieb:
> > Why is not possible add the package support as is on Delphi (using
> > Rtl.bpl, Vcl.bpl ...)?
>
> Time?
>
> >
> > Only if my project is compiled
llist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
> http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
>
--
Best regards...
Fabio Dell'Aria.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
TED]>:
>
> On 26 Dec 2007, at 18:25, Fabio Dell'Aria wrote:
>
> > Hi to all and merry xmas,
> >
> > I have some questions on the 2.4 version.
> >
> > 1)...will be the debug information availables on separated files or
> > I'll need alway use the &qu
es when will be available the first test version with
packagees support)?
3)when will be released the 2.4 version?
--
Best regards...
Fabio Dell'Aria.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
60 matches
Mail list logo
