but this is probably not the way you want to go ;-).
Konstantin
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Sven Barth schrieb:
Am 11.07.2012 16:36, schrieb Konstantin:
Hello!
Free Pascal has been designed to run on several platforms on many
architectures which is a neat feature. The executable name is chosen
accordingly - ppc386, ppcx64 etc. to be able to have many at the same
time on the same
d comments to the Gentoo bug report above.
Have fun,
Konstantin
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Tomas Hajny wrote:
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 17 aug 2006, at 21:40, Konstantin MĂźnning wrote:
There are some other inconsistencies to previous versions of FPC and
Borland Pascal like assembler syntax and pointer addition
(inc(Pointer,LongInt) does not work anymore).
Please (as always) post
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 17 aug 2006, at 21:40, Konstantin Münning wrote:
There are some other inconsistencies to previous versions of FPC and
Borland Pascal like assembler syntax and pointer addition
(inc(Pointer,LongInt) does not work anymore).
Please (as always) post a test program
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 17 aug 2006, at 21:40, Konstantin Münning wrote:
There are some other inconsistencies to previous versions of FPC and
Borland Pascal like assembler syntax and pointer addition
(inc(Pointer,LongInt) does not work anymore).
Please (as always) post a test program
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 18 aug 2006, at 13:36, Konstantin Münning wrote:
PROGRAM Original;
{$ASMMODE Intel}
PROCEDURE Test(p:Pointer;l:LongInt;w:Word;b:Byte);ASSEMBLER;
ASM
mov eax,[p]
mov eax,[l]
mov ax,[w]
mov al,[b]
END;
BEGIN
END.
This program is like the code
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Konstantin Münning wrote:
By the way, I've found the following code in compiler/cclasses.pas when
I searched for the whereabouts of maxavail/memavail and there were some
more like this in the sources:
{$ifdef HASGETHEAPSTATUS}
status:=GetFPCHeapStatus
Hi Micha!
Thanks for the amusing comments :-). Let me add some of mine.
Micha Nelissen wrote:
On Mon, 23 May 2005 02:29:48 +0200
Konstantin Münning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But when there is no memory left and you need
some you can't behave perfect. Please let it be the programmers choice
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 23 mei 2005, at 02:29, Konstantin Münning wrote:
What would you suggest to return under an OS like Windows, Mac OS X or
Linux? The current free memory of the OS? Free memory + buffer cache
- minimal buffer cache size enforced by the OS? The previous +
available swap
day,
--
Konstantin Münning
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Konstantin Münning wrote:
Hi everybody!
Why in fact were MaxAvail,MemAvail,HeapSize removed from the RTL? The
explanation in install/doc/whatsnew.txt is puzzling me a bit:
- Removed MaxAvail, MemAvail, HeapSize due to their unreliability
(bogus/misleading
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 23 May 2005, at 00:56, Konstantin Münning wrote:
No. Either you catch exceptions resulting from a lack of memory and
recover, and then you have the same checking as before, except that
the
check happens atomically (by the OS: you ask for more memory
as it
may be an unintentional error but if the compiler compiles
int64 integer
as
int64temp := integer;
int64 int64temp
it would be just the intended behaviuor in any 'normal' situation I can
imagine.
Have a nice day,
--
Konstantin Münning
14 matches
Mail list logo
