Hi,can anyone tell me why most of the messages I send to this list
end-up with a "host is blacklisted" return
message?Matthias.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Hello,
I've downloaded the packet with as, ld aso. from
freepascal ftp server, unpacked it and compiled th RTL (without any problems!).
Now I want to compile a hello, world application for bsd on my Win32 box. I've
found the compiler switch -Tfreebsd, used it and the content of generated fi
field?
Regards,
Matthias Hryniszak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
The FCL is non visual? You mean the LCL? I don't know if you can do much
about it. The OOP design of the LCL makes smartlinking impossible.
Yes, of course I ment LCL.. sorry.
Matthias.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://
Nobody said that the same size can be reached, but I don't consider 132k
against 86k as a real problem. If you consider it as a problem, use
Delphi.
That's not what I ment. I see a problem with a GUI app that's using FCL.
This apps are really of size that's not acceptable. That's why I started
The only way to get better smartlinking is to build an integrated linker
in the compiler. That way we can control everything.
Might it be possible to keep a recerence counter for procedures/methods
while compiling them and then not to include them in the objects that are
passed to the linker?
- Original Message -
From: "Jonas Maebe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FPC developers' list"
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2005 1:10 PM
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] don't youthinkit'stime
toupdatedelphimodecompatibility? - IDispatch, implements
On 29 May
iël Mantione wrote:
Op Sat, 29 May 2004, schreef Matthias Hryniszak:
It *is* the source. The compiler is perfectly capapable of removing
unused
code ust as well as the Delphi compiler. So, if you're pointing at the
compiler I assume you either have smartlinking disabled or that there is
debu
- Original Message -
From: "Daniël Mantione" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FPC developers' list"
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2005 12:30 PM
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] don't you think
it'stimetoupdatedelphimodecompatibility? - IDispatch, implements
- Original Message -
From: "Florian Klaempfl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FPC developers' list"
Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2005 11:20 PM
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] don't you think it'stime
toupdatedelphimodecompatibility? - IDispatch, implements
Besides I find that FPC 2.0 makes the executabl
- Original Message -
From: "Florian Klaempfl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FPC developers' list"
Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2005 11:20 PM
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] don't you think it'stime
toupdatedelphimodecompatibility? - IDispatch, implements
Besides I find that FPC 2.0 makes the execu
- Original Message -
From: "Tomas Hajny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FPC developers' list"
Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2005 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel] don't you think it's time
toupdatedelphimodecompatibility? - IDispatch, implements
Bisma Jayadi said:
Some known missing function
ROTFL, that's how things go when "money" becomes an issue.
Regards,
Matthias.
- Original Message -
From: "peter green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FPC developers' list"
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 5:44 PM
Subject: RE: [fpc-devel] PPC64 port
"DO NOT CONTACT THE JUDGES DIRECTLY. ANY ENTRA
That's to bad. This means, that my previous question about interfaces.is to
be butted in the same drawer..
- Original Message -
From: "Florian Klaempfl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FPC developers' list"
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 9:30 PM
Subject: R
Hi,
I've got a question about COM programming in FPC. In the docs
(http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/ref/refsu20.html) I've found:
Variants and interfaces
Remark: Dispatch interface support for variants is currently broken in the
compiler.
Is it still true? Why when I try to compile this simp
15 matches
Mail list logo
