On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd
markmll.fpc-de...@telemetry.co.uk wrote:
Yes, a IIIe I scrounged. I believe there's a Pascal compiler for it but
I've never tried running it.
I believe that the Palms were at one time popular as a brain for
mobile robot experiments,
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'll try to improve the unit names of the android unit and its dependencies
a bit and then it might become the first package for FPC-JVM ;)
Sven, thanks for your tests. Adding hwfpo (Hello World From Pascal
Only)
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Jonas Maebe jonas.ma...@elis.ugent.bewrote:
There is a new branch in svn (branches/jvmbackend) that contains support
for compiling Pascal code into Java virtual machine bytecode. While it does
not support all language constructs and while there are some
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
graemeg.li...@gmail.comwrote:
On 15 August 2011 10:48, Michael Schnell wrote:
I never tried this, but I feel that IDEs (integrating code editor, GUI
designer, make process, and debugger) have been invented for a purpose.
I agree with all
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys
graemeg.li...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thursday, 18 August 2011, Max Vlasov wrote:
Adding new aligners and using it for items of another aligner can build
very complex layouts not using direct coordinates at all. Seems like the
port
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 12:49 AM, Florian Klämpfl flor...@freepascal.orgwrote:
Am 07.08.2011 18:27, schrieb Jonas Maebe:
And I don't
understand all this hostility towards Embarcadero.
Indeed. People should be happy that there is a pretty large commercial
vendor which provides an
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Alexander Klenin kle...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 18:53, Hans-Peter Diettrich
drdiettri...@aol.com wrote:
When the meaning of const/constref is documented as kind of a *calling
convention*, that allows the compiler to optimize the code, no more
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 4:45 AM, Chad Berchek ad...@vobarian.com wrote:
1. It seems that if a string is a (non-const) local variable it should be
safe. I base this on the following reasoning:
looks like it's not:
procedure TForm1.Button1Click(Sender: TObject);
var
S: string;
procedure
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 4:13 AM, Martin f...@mfriebe.de wrote:
On 09/07/2011 00:59, Max Vlasov wrote:
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 3:14 AM, Martinf...@mfriebe.de wrote:
function CRCConstString(constref Str: string): integer;
does what you describ
Hmm, it's interesting.. Some observations
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 3:14 AM, Martin f...@mfriebe.de wrote:
On 09/07/2011 00:09, Max Vlasov wrote:
The answer is indirect referencing. it's a workaround that probably
will solve the problem, but I must admit that I don't know what is the
exact performance price. The compiler when it detects
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Chad Berchek ad...@vobarian.com wrote:
I've been reading over some of the recent discussion about reference
counting problems with const string parameters. I've done some
experiments and I believe that the so-called const optimization is a
serious flaw, not
with a define. But I may be wrong
Max Vlasov
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich
drdiettri...@aol.comwrote:
I thing there might be some logical contradictions I'm not aware at the
moment, but I think they can be resolved with general oop inheritance logic.
My experience with const methods in C++ often resulted in a
features that later possible other parties
(read Embarcadero :) will be willing to adapt?
Thanks,
Max Vlasov
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Sergei Gorelkin sergei_gorel...@mail.ruwrote:
Max Vlasov пишет:
Speaking of new features, I remember the bunch of them were introduced
with Delphi 1.0 and many of them were inspired by other languages and
dialects. I admit that frequent implementing
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Max Vlasov max.vla...@gmail.com wrote:
An idea here is to introduce a directive (maybe something else, but
directive looks more straightforward), let's call it readonly that forces
the method to be able only to read the fields and properties of the object
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Nikolay Nikolov
nick...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On 11/26/2010 10:42 AM, Max Vlasov wrote:
Is anyone aware of similar concept in any other OOP language?
Yes, C++ has it:
http://duramecho.com/ComputerInformation/WhyHowCppConst.html
It's true that it's
and straightforward.
Other consideration, if something starts to depend on future decisions of
other developers, isn't it easy to create a simple (very simple) workaround
:)
Max Vlasov
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Andrew Brunner andrew.t.brun...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Max Vlasov max.vla...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrew,
Creating TList as a field for storing extra structures and objects and
supporting extra data reference using Tag as an index
not portable
hint/warning so no matter how big Tag is, writing
SomeMyAddr:=pointer(Obj.Tag) already warns the developer.
Hmm, also a little off-topic analogy, AMD was the second until they were
first with 64-bit processors. Intel just had to follow. Project this to
Pascal ;-)
Max Vlasov
section of a unit) showed very little performance degradation, but
for general approach it was almost unnoticeable.
What you think?
Thanks,
Max Vlasov,
maxerist.net
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 1:40 AM, Willibald Krenn willibald.kr...@gmx.atwrote:
Hi,
Am 21.11.2010 12:49, schrieb Max Vlasov:
I recently read the info about current implementation of packages and a
post that dynamic packages support is at the early stage or not started
yet. Knowing that fpc
22 matches
Mail list logo
