On 17/02/19 9:12 PM, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
Am 17.02.19 um 02:42 schrieb Neil Graham:
I think for the most part, if any clean slate is needed for FPC it is
for the Libraries and not the language. A Class library that was
built to support the language as it currently stands rather than
On 17/02/19 10:37 AM, Ralf Quint wrote:
On 2/14/2019 9:28 PM, James via fpc-devel wrote:
I'm interested in starting (or joining) a discussion on the next
(*non* backwards compatible) version of FPC. Instead of being
classically object oriented, there is merit in examining a model with
ad-hoc p
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 22:44 +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> You can then very easily maintain your own plain tarballs, and no need
> to download huge archives every so many months.
>
That looked all very interesting and complex (I guess after I've done it
a bit that goes away)
But does this ne
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 22:25 +0200, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> In our previous episode, Neil Graham said:
> > Something that is just a plain old tarball of the files needed would
> > simplify things a great deal for me.
>
> Aren't you going into the BSD ports directio
Would it be possible to get plain tarballs of freepascal hosted on the
website?
I am working on a zeroinstall feed for freepascal and I have ran into
various issues with all of the current versions.
The Tar of Tarballs is just a bit awkward for zeroinstall to deal with,
I've also found problems w
On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 16:05 +0100, mm wrote:
> Neil Graham a écrit :
> >
> > It may mean an easy and acceptable solution. They may just say no.
> > Then again it may be like drawing the gaze of the eye of mordor.
>
> I don't think it is a good idea. In case of
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 18:10 +0700, Bee wrote:
> Maybe we should start some kind of code legality check. Like what had
> been done by ReactOS a few months ago against Windows' code. This tool
> might helps us review FPC's and Lazarus' code against Delphi code (or
> other as well?).
Wouldn't it
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
I profiled it some time ago and the compile time is simple spread over
the compiler. Only two procedures consumed a lot of time: fillchar and
move. I added the fastmove code at this time because we spend at least
some time in move.
What did you do to profile it? Is it so
Daniël Mantione wrote:
Andreas uses a preprocessor to convert the language extensions into Delphi
compatible code. This is a remarkable achievement, but I don't see much
value for this approach for Free Pascal; since we have the source code, we
could implement the features directly.
I think
L wrote:
If you read something you don't like on PasWiki, I expect you all
to analyze me and write about me. Don't remain quiet! Make your own websites,
bring it up on the
mailing lists. I would like more people to shred me to pieces with their own
websites so we can have
some more FPC content
10 matches
Mail list logo
