Any further thoughts on this? I am already using it in a new project for
quite some time now and it has proven to be very useful in several cases by
exposing read only views of the same container that is used internally by
classes without additional boilerplate and with fast access and rtti
On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 12:07 PM Sven Barth via fpc-devel
wrote:
> I'm against it. It would essentially mean that you can't use the same
> field for the setter or that you'd need to go through a method.
> Exchanging one restriction (can't use a base class for the property) for
> another (can't
Am 04.06.2020 um 03:45 schrieb Kostas Michalopoulos via fpc-devel:
Hello,
I'd like to add a small feature for property getters to allow
themselves be exposed as a base type of the real field. Example:
===
program ExposeDerivedAsBase;
{$mode objfpc}
type
TBase = class
end;
TDerived =
Hello,
I'd like to add a small feature for property getters to allow
themselves be exposed as a base type of the real field. Example:
===
program ExposeDerivedAsBase;
{$mode objfpc}
type
TBase = class
end;
TDerived = class(TBase)
end;
TSomething = class
private
FProp: TDerived;
