Am 03.09.2013 04:10 schrieb Michel Catudal mcatu...@comcast.net:
Le 2013-09-02 13:51, Sven Barth a écrit :
Every other developer of FPC will tell you the same: The only supported
version for compiling a development (2.7.1) or fixes (2.6.3) version is
either the last release (2.6.2) or a
On Tue, September 3, 2013 08:03, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 03.09.2013 04:10 schrieb Michel Catudal mcatu...@comcast.net:
Le 2013-09-02 13:51, Sven Barth a écrit :
Every other developer of FPC will tell you the same: The only
supported
version for compiling a development (2.7.1) or fixes (2.6.3)
On 2-9-2013 19:51, Sven Barth wrote:
Every other developer of FPC will tell you the same: The only
supported version for compiling a development (2.7.1) or fixes (2.6.3)
version is either the last release (2.6.2) or a development/fixes
version of the same revision and nothing else.
2.7.1
On 03 Sep 2013, at 11:56, Thaddy wrote:
For my Friday toys (Pi's) I use 2.7.1 with the new ARM options and bootstrap
with OVERRIDEVERSIONCHECK=1
I think that is a perfectly viable option.
It is not, as evidenced by the fact that about 99% of this thread until now has
been about trying to
On 3-9-2013 12:06, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 03 Sep 2013, at 11:56, Thaddy wrote:
For my Friday toys (Pi's) I use 2.7.1 with the new ARM options and bootstrap
with OVERRIDEVERSIONCHECK=1
I think that is a perfectly viable option.
It is not, as evidenced by the fact that about 99% of this thread
In our previous episode, Thaddy said:
Your answer is to the point and right.
It is of ultimate importance, though, that the compiler options for
armXX have changed considerably since 2.6.2/3.
For my Friday toys (Pi's) I use 2.7.1 with the new ARM options and
bootstrap with
On 3-9-2013 12:24, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Thaddy said:
Your answer is to the point and right.
It is of ultimate importance, though, that the compiler options for
armXX have changed considerably since 2.6.2/3.
For my Friday toys (Pi's) I use 2.7.1 with the new ARM
On 03.09.2013 12:08, Thaddy wrote:
On 3-9-2013 12:06, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 03 Sep 2013, at 11:56, Thaddy wrote:
For my Friday toys (Pi's) I use 2.7.1 with the new ARM options and
bootstrap with OVERRIDEVERSIONCHECK=1
I think that is a perfectly viable option.
It is not, as evidenced by the
Le 2013-09-03 02:03, Sven Barth a écrit :
You should be able to take your 2.6.2 hardfloat ppcarm binary only from your
Ubuntu and copy that to your funtoo. You can then invoke the compilation this
way:
make clean all FPC=/path/to/2.6.2/ppcarm
You should nevertheless have your 2.7.1 bin
Le 2013-09-01 10:07, Sven Barth a écrit :
On 01.09.2013 05:02, Michel Catudal wrote:
Le 2013-08-31 16:47, Sven Barth a écrit :
On Linux it hasn't compiled since May. It crashes before the RTL stuff. The
compiler itself does compile.
An error message would be nice.
If the error is that bx
On 02.09.2013 17:32, Michel Catudal wrote:
Le 2013-09-01 10:07, Sven Barth a écrit :
On 01.09.2013 05:02, Michel Catudal wrote:
Le 2013-08-31 16:47, Sven Barth a écrit :
On Linux it hasn't compiled since May. It crashes before the RTL stuff. The
compiler itself does compile.
An error
Le 2013-09-02 11:44, Sven Barth a écrit :
On 02.09.2013 17:32, Michel Catudal wrote:
Le 2013-09-01 10:07, Sven Barth a écrit :
On 01.09.2013 05:02, Michel Catudal wrote:
Le 2013-08-31 16:47, Sven Barth a écrit :
On Linux it hasn't compiled since May. It crashes before the RTL stuff.
The
On 02.09.2013 19:14, Michel Catudal wrote:
Le 2013-09-02 11:44, Sven Barth a écrit :
On 02.09.2013 17:32, Michel Catudal wrote:
Le 2013-09-01 10:07, Sven Barth a écrit :
On 01.09.2013 05:02, Michel Catudal wrote:
Le 2013-08-31 16:47, Sven Barth a écrit :
On Linux it hasn't compiled since
Le 2013-09-02 13:51, Sven Barth a écrit :
Every other developer of FPC will tell you the same: The only supported
version for compiling a development (2.7.1) or fixes (2.6.3) version is
either the last release (2.6.2) or a development/fixes version of the same
revision and nothing else.
On 01.09.2013 05:02, Michel Catudal wrote:
Le 2013-08-31 16:47, Sven Barth a écrit :
On 31.08.2013 13:47, Martin wrote:
It is probably my fault somewhere, since I do not know the exact
procedure to be followed.
BUT:
In a checkout of
http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpcbuild/trunk in
It is probably my fault somewhere, since I do not know the exact
procedure to be followed.
BUT:
In a checkout of
http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpcbuild/trunk in C:/FPC/SVN/build_trunk/
PATH=C:/FPC/SVN/build_trunk/install\binw32
cd C:/FPC/SVN/build_trunk/fpsrc
// a starting native 2.6.2
It is probably my fault somewhere, since I do not know the exact
procedure to be followed.
BUT:
In a checkout of
http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpcbuild/trunk in C:/FPC/SVN/build_trunk/
PATH=C:/FPC/SVN/build_trunk/install\binw32
cd C:/FPC/SVN/build_trunk/fpsrc
// a starting native 2.6.2
On 31.08.2013 13:47, Martin wrote:
It is probably my fault somewhere, since I do not know the exact
procedure to be followed.
BUT:
In a checkout of
http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpcbuild/trunk in C:/FPC/SVN/build_trunk/
PATH=C:/FPC/SVN/build_trunk/install\binw32
cd
Le 2013-08-31 16:47, Sven Barth a écrit :
On 31.08.2013 13:47, Martin wrote:
It is probably my fault somewhere, since I do not know the exact
procedure to be followed.
BUT:
In a checkout of
http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpcbuild/trunk in C:/FPC/SVN/build_trunk/
19 matches
Mail list logo
